Charlotte McDonald-Gibson is a compassionate woman. She is
also a journalist and a commentator. She wrote an article that is a genuine cry
from the heart; a plea for the world powers to increase their effort for saving
the lives of refugees who drown at sea trying to reach a safe harbor in Europe .
She wrote an article on the subject that was published in
the New York Times on June 22, 2016. Given the content of the presentation, you
would expect that the title chosen for it by the editors of the New York Times
would read something like this: “A powerful Plea to save Lives,” or something
like this: “A Call for humanitarian Action.” But that's not what the editors
chose to do. Instead, they published the article under this title: “For Europe , Arab Lives Matter More Than Africans”.
This is a hate crime that is not subtle enough to hide the
purpose for which it was formulated. It is the work of lowlife characters
trying to stir up the hatred of African Americans who may not like the tactics
used by some people in the “Black Lives Matter” movement, but sympathize with
its message. The hate criminals at the New York Times are telling these
Americans it is time for them to start hating – but not just anyone. They
should start hating the Arabs who are well treated, say the NY Times haters,
and they should start hating the Europeans who save the lives of Arabs while
letting Black people drown at sea. That’s the message the New York Times hate
machine is now trying to spread.
It is a hate crime that has the Star of David stamped all
over it. It is a weapon that's frequently used by the Jewish establishment to
try achieving their demonic designs. Normally, the Jewish leaders do what they
do in subtle ways and avoid getting caught, but it happened on two occasions
that the Jews got caught using this weapon of sheer cowardice.
There was that time when they were caught whispering their
message of hate in the ears of a number of African American leaders. They were
telling them that the Arab countries spend too much time pleading the cause of
Palestinians at the UN when they should be devoting their energies pleading the
cause of Africans whose needs are greater than the Palestinians. Another time,
Israeli operators were exposed as they whispered the same message in the ears
of African leaders both in Africa, and in the corridors of the UN building in New York .
The Jews failed to achieve anything substantial for
themselves in either of those occasions. It can also be surmised that they
failed even when they were subtle enough to avoid being caught. The proof is
that their record at turning the sub-Saharan countries against the Arabs of
North Africa remains a dismal one.
Here is the passage in the Gibson article that the editors
of the New York Times have used as excuse to spread the hate: “The European
Union draws a distinction between a genuine refugee and an economic migrant,
and people coming from the world's poorest continent are generally assumed to
be the latter. It is a narrative of the ‘good’ migrant and the ‘bad’ one that
leads to policies focused on keeping people out and ignores a more nuanced
reality”.
As can be seen, there is nothing in those words to suggest
that Europe appreciates Arab lives more than
Black lives. The distinction that's made is one between a “genuine refugee” and
an “economic migrant.” In fact this is not a distinction that the Europeans
have invented. It is a policy that's enforced everywhere in the world, including
the Americas and Australia who
take in migrants as well as refugees.
Gibson herself makes the following point: “Europe
cannot be expected to offer a home to every person fleeing poverty or
persecution, and European Union governments are right to try to come up with
policies that deter people from making the voyage”.
She is a compassionate woman, but she also realizes that in
real life, leaders must recognize the limits of what they can and cannot do.
For this reason they set priorities that give immediate relief to those who
need it most while searching for alternatives to accommodate the others.
She criticizes the European Union for not taking the correct
steps to deal with the situation, and offers her own set of priorities as to
how the Union can go about solving the
problem. This is how civilized people do things, and how they present their
ideas free of spin and subtle messages of hate.