There are those of us who spent our adult lives warning the
North American establishment it was conned into believing that the Jewish
attacks on foreign countries and their peoples, were meant to make the world a
better place. We explained that the attacks were meant instead to achieve
nefarious goals. Now that time has passed, the proof is in to the effect that
what sounded like kosher talk, turned out to be unclean lies.
We, who did the warning, could see that the Jewish attacks
on foreign nations were designed to impress not the people overseas, but the
people here at home. The goal was to acquaint the North American population
with the Judeo-Yiddish culture of slander and insults so as to normalize such
behavior over here and fuse it with the prevailing culture. We could see that
the Jewish leaders in charge of the scheme were paving the way for the full
exploitation of the continent, and we raised our voices but nobody listened.
Despite the fact that our predictions came true in the sense
that no one sane will now deny that North America is being exploited
politically, culturally, diplomatically, financially and militarily by the Jews
– nobody except for one or two women, has for a long time, complained loudly enough
to be noticed. But as it happens in a good drama, the unexpected did occur, and
someone has finally raised his voice somewhat loudly enough to shake things up.
Regrettably, however, he did not discuss the cause and effect of the situation;
he only discussed the effect without even suggesting there may have been a
cause.
He is Victor Davis Hanson who wrote: “Journalism R.I.P.,” an
article that was published on June 6, 2016 in National Review Online. As the
title implies, the author is suggesting that journalism in North
America has died. Now, given that journalism is practiced both by
the Left and the Right of the political spectrum, you expect to see a critique
of the two sides. But that's not what Hanson does in this article or any
article, for that matter.
Instead of laying out a non-partisan view of what journalism
is doing that's wrong or incomplete, he paints a picture of the deficiencies he
detected in the leftist publications. This is probably why he failed to see
that he is himself deficient, and that his shortcomings are adding to the
deterioration of the profession in North America .
In the end, he wrote an article that's as damning of the Left as ever, and
nothing else that’s redeeming.
Still, there is one thing that's new in the article: the mention
of a recent incident. It is that Donald Trump who is running to be President of
the United States ,
is being sued by someone, and the case is overseen by a judge of Mexican
descent. It is a complicated case that's still ongoing, but there have been hearings
during which the judge made rulings. Trump believes that the rulings were
unfair to him, attributing the judge's biased attitude against him to his
Mexican ethnicity because Trump promised that if elected President, he'll build
a wall on the border and have Mexico pay for it.
There has been uproar about that saying, and Victor Hanson
came to Trump’s defense. Hanson's point is that if Supreme Court Justice Sonia
Sotomayor could point to her Latin background as a measure of her qualification
to be a good judge, so can Trump point to the Mexican background of Gonzalo
Curiel as a measure of his disqualification to oversee this case. And so, the
question we must ask is this: Is there equivalence between the two situations?
And the answer we must give is: no, there is no equivalence between them.
The reason is that in a country that's made of immigrants
from all over the word, everyone is proud of their heritage, and many wear
their pride on their sleeve. Because it is acceptable to do so, Ronald Reagan exhibited
pride in his Irish heritage, and Joe Lieberman in his Jewish religion. What is
not acceptable, however, would have been someone trying to disqualify them
because of who they are. And yet, this is what Trump is trying to do to Judge
Curiel.
Yes, something like that did happen long ago. It was a time
when John Kennedy felt compelled to state that his Catholicism will not affect
his judgment as President of the United States … but these days are
gone. Now, you can be proud of your heritage, and no one can disqualify you
because of it.