Jews are being Jews when they incessantly do the wrong
thing. And right now the fanatics among them are going after the Iran nuclear
deal like a serial rapist goes after the girl he is obsessed with.
A manifestation of this reality is in the column that came
under the title: “How the next president can start fixing the Iran Deal,”
written by Benny Avni and published on June 1, 2016 in the New York Post.
The impression you get when reading this piece is the same as
that of listening to someone that's totally out of it. Given that the writer
makes as much sense as someone that's right out the “Twilight Zone,” you wonder
if he is a space alien that shape-shifted into a human form, or if he is a
human being that's possessed by an alien entity or worse, possessed by a demon
right out of hell.
Having called the Iran nuclear deal “downright dangerous,”
look what it is that's stirring Benny Avni, and decide for yourself if this is
the response of a space alien or that of a demon:
“Iran
was supposed to reduce its stockpiles of heavy water. Oops – turns out it
overproduced and has 70 extra tons … America
will buy some even though Iranian access to US currency wasn't part of the deal
… But where is that excess stock now? Olli Heinonen told reporters 'It looks
that it isn't in US possession' while the purchase details are finalized … If
Iran still legally owns that stock today, that's a violation of the deal … As a
former inspector at the IAEA, Heinonen should know. He says the IAEA report on
that file is 'fairly thin,' missing details.”
Let's go over that brazenly non-human logic. Avni makes it
clear he is stirred up because America
will buy heavy water that Iran
is required to get rid of. He is unhappy because he assumes that America will pay in US currency despite the fact that
having access to US currency “wasn't part of the deal,” he says.
Well, let's assume America
will pay in US
currency and not any other. What might have forbidden America from doing this would be a
specific ban written into the agreement. But like Avni has noted, there is no
such ban in the agreement. And yet, he still calls the transaction a violation
of that very agreement. Well, my friend, adhering to this kind of logic has
immense ramifications when it infests the agencies of government and the other
cultural institutions – as we shall see in a moment.
In addition to that, Benny Avni is also stirred up because
Olli Heinonen said “it looks like” the heavy water isn't in US possession while
the purchase details are finalized. He is unhappy because, if true, it means
that – on paper – Iran
still owns the stock. And that, says he, is a violation of the deal. To give
credence to the “accusation” (if true,) he says that Heinonen should know
because he was inspector at the IAEA. But what exactly does Heinonen know?
Well, he actually admits he knows nothing because, as he says, the report on
that file is “fairly thin, missing details.” There you go with that same logic
again.
Now imagine someone being endowed (more like plagued) with
that kind of logic. Imagine he also believes that when something is not
specifically allowed or forbidden – he, as a Jew, can arbitrarily declare it to
be legally binding on others. What kind of a world do you think he will build?
The answer is not too difficult to imagine; just look at the uselessness that
is the American Congress of the brain dead – so rendered by the Jews who took
control of it. Do you want a world that looks like that?
Now that Benny Avni has explained how he views the existing
situation, he starts arguing how the next president can fix the Iran deal. He
says that because the current director of the IAEA “has taken the line that
everything is OK,” the next president of the United States can only do a limited
number of things, among them the following:
Rethink closing the Iran nuclear file because the deal
contains many deficiencies, he says. He does not suggest that the agreement
should be altered or renegotiated because he wants no deal at all. Instead, he
wants to impose more sanctions on Iran for testing missiles, even if
this is not part of the nuclear deal. Moreover, he wants to impose new
sanctions for human-rights violations, and he wants America
to do what it can to deny Iran
access to world financial institutions.
He is also adamant about the next president signaling early
on that Iran
will no longer have it easy. That's because the current paradigm is this: “It's
the deal or the war,” and must be changed to become this: “Let's have both the
deal and the war”.
Now you know why more and more people throughout the world
are coming around to saying: We tried all sorts of humane solutions and nothing
worked. We are now obligated to try the Final Solution.