The Weekly Standard of the Neocons has given us a gift that
keeps on giving. Her name is Jenna Lifhits who comes up with example after
example demonstrating how and why the Jews dug their own graves time after time
everywhere they went no matter whom they interacted with.
Her latest installment came under the title: “Anti-Israel
Group to Hold National Meeting at George Mason University [GMU],” an article
that also came under the subtitle: “Students for Justice in Palestine will host
such workshops as '(50) Shades of Zionism.'” It was published on November 3,
2016 in the Weekly Standard.
This piece of work forces us to pose a good question: Is it
possible for someone trained to identify the relevant elements in an article
such as this, to then conclude that the writer is painting a picture of the
Jews that will so revolt normal human beings, they will want to see the Jews
vanished from the community or even the world? The answer is yes, and it does
not take much training to be proficient at spotting and identifying such
elements.
Look how Lifhits begins the article: “Activists who advocate
for the destruction of Israel...” When the destruction of Israel is mentioned,
or when the memory of the Holocaust – which means the destruction of the Jews –
is invoked, you know that the writer views the situation as extreme. Well then,
if the stakes are this high, you expect to see a powerful argument as to why
Lifhits accuses someone of planning to commit an act as extreme as this. But if
she fails to do that, you'll have an argument of your own to make.
So you search for her powerful argument in the article, and
all you find is a low caliber whining about nothing. Here it is:
“Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) shout down speakers;
chant “we support the intifada” and advocate for the BDS movement … They hold
workshops such as '(50) Shades of Zionism and BDS 101' … One student has called
for violent resistance on Twitter, expressing expletive-laden condemnation of
Israel using social media; tweeting 'f–israel every day until the fall of the
zionist regime; also confronts a television show for not giving air time to
Holocaust deniers”.
The whining continues:
“Other speakers include a proponent of the BDS movement who
has said that Israel is located in the Middle East 'only because Uganda wasn't
available [a historical fact]' … Another activist charged Israel with ethnic
cleansing and apartheid”.
And so, you cry out: Is that all they whine about? However,
before you pass judgment on them or make an argument of your own, you want to
know if this is a deficiency of the Weekly Standard or one of the Jewish mentality.
And you find an answer in the article. It is that Jenna Lifhits talked to the
Anti-Defamation League that told her: “The SJP organize events, many of which
accuse Israel of war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and genocide; also advocate for
BDS campaigns, and have compared Israelis to Nazis”.
That nails it for you – the deficiency belongs to the Jewish
mentality. So you wonder: Has no one told these people how such matters are
handled in a democracy? But as it turned out, the Jews were given a lesson on
this topic. It seems, however, that the lecturer was talking to a wall since
none of what he said registered with them. Here is how a spokesman at GMU put
it to them:
“All organizations have the right to host meetings on campus
– regardless of whether we agree or disagree with the positions of said groups
… GMU has been praised for its commitment to free speech … encourages free and
open dialogue which may involve the exchange of points of view some may find
offensive … We believe the best way to counter offensive speech is through more
speech, not less”.
But if the Jewish mentality is this flimsy and primitive,
how is it that the Jews had so much success destroying the lives and careers of
other decent people during the last half century? The answer is that they never
entered a contest in which their philosophy, morality, principles or ideals
were pitted against those of others. What the Jews have been doing to win, was
the moral equivalent of crushing the knees of their opponents before entering
the arena. Without someone to fight them, they declared themselves winners, and
no one disputed that premise.
The Jews did it by infiltrating the high echelons of every
country in which they settled. They immediately started working at getting
close to the governing elites. Using the method of bribe and blackmail, they
shaped the law enforcement agencies in such a way as to protect themselves
against the sons and daughters of the country that welcomed them. Those that
dissented from the Jewish decrees and proclamations were kneecapped
professionally, and their lives were ruined.
Everywhere they went the Jews practiced that approach and
had an early success. But then the masses realized what they were doing, and
rose up to cull them in the proverbial gas chamber of the time.