Speaking of the dynastic phenomenon of mafia succession and
inheritance, the late Eric Sevareid once suggested that an intense cultural
trait can alter the biological operation of a human organ such as the brain, and
make it function abnormally. This abnormality is then inherited by descendants
who grow up natural mafiosi.
This in mind, the more that you probe into the ways that the
Jewish brain functions, the more you become convinced that Eric Sevareid was
onto something. You get repeated indications that his theory is plausible when
you read the Weekly Standard which is the flagship of the neocon publications.
That's where the Jewish contributors keep revealing their total inability to
put things in their proper perspective due to a handicap that can only be of a
biological origin.
To wit, these Jews never fail to demonstrate the horrific
deficiency that's plaguing them, failing to see what the world sees when Israel
responds disproportionately to the normal state of frustration that Palestinian
kids express when the pressure on them rises beyond the boiling point. These
are children of the human species (born and raised under a bestial Jewish rule
for three generations already) who get hammered by the terror inducing weaponry
that America gives to Israel free of
charge.
The response to that situation, both in Israel and outside of it, is that the Jewish
leaders and their echo-repeaters come out en masse and protest not the terror
that Israel inflicts on the
Palestinians, but the way that the world responds to Israel 's ongoing crimes against
humanity. Israel
is not treated fairly, they say, and cry out for a balanced approach that will
make both sides equally culpable, they add. You look at their reasoning and realize
they are so handicapped bio-mentally, they cannot see the difference between a
kid that's armed with a stone, and an army that's coming at him shooting from
tanks and helicopter gunships.
The handicap limiting the biological operation of the Jewish
brain is not restricted to their failure at seeing how large some things are;
that failure goes the other way too. That is, they also fail to see how small
some things are. And it is the combination of the two failures that causes them
to exaggerate on many of the things they and we encounter together in everyday
life. It causes them to go beyond the pale when responding to instances that
are small and negligible, and this causes every human being to bristle.
There is an example illustrating this reality in an article
that came under the title: “Undoing the Iran deal? Easy,” written by Lee
Smith and published on November 15, 2016 in the Weekly Standard. The author is
repeating a false accusation that was made many times before to the effect that
Iran
has cheated on the nuclear deal. Look at the condensed passage that follows:
“The Obama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths
… turning a blind eye to Iranian violations of the deal … Iran exceeded the
deal's threshold for heavy water … The White House acknowledged Iran had
exceeded the limit and then, bizarrely, praised the regime for its
forthrightness in 'making no attempt to hide' the violation. In other words,
the Obama administration is not just protecting the nuclear agreement, but also
rationalizing the Iranian regime's violation of it”.
But the fact is that Iran did not violate the agreement
by exceeding the deal's threshold. Here is what happened: Knowing that when you
run an industrial process in which you constantly add to your inventory and
draw from it you sometimes overshoot or undershoot some of the limits, the
negotiators of the Iran Nuclear Deal set a threshold but allowed some leeway.
The editors of the Wall Street Journal called that:
“Loopholes for the Mullahs” and complained about it on September 2, 2016 in an
editorial which came by that title. Here is what they said: “The deal was
supposed to cap Iran 's
production of heavy water at 130 tons, but a loophole allows Iran to exceed
that”.
To be ignorant of what happens in an industrial setting is
bad alright, but that's not a major deficiency. What shows that the people of
the Weekly Standard are deficient bio-culturally is that they lost all sense of
proportion. Here is what Jenna Lifhits reported on November 10, 2016: “The country
was roughly one-tenth of a metric ton above the deal's 130 metric ton limit”.
And here is how I responded two days later: “When the
estimate is 130, and you exceed that value by one tenth of one unit, you are
off by one part in 1,300. This is like someone on a diet that's told to stay at
roughly 130 pounds, but found one day to register 1.6 ounces higher than that”.
Thus, for Lee Smith of the Weekly Standard to be out of
whack at every level and write an article about a situation that was shown to
be no problem at all, suggests that he needs help at the outpatient level.
But when he ends the article with a hysterical shout in
which he suggests taking an act that will bring a calamity more horrifying than
what's unfolding in the Levant at this time, he needs to be locked-up somewhere
safe for the rest of his life.