Michael Rubin wrote an article to say that the Israelis are
the good guys who do not want war, and that the Iranians are the bad guys who
want one.
By the time he gets to the end of the article, he concludes
that in dealing with that country, “the best option is containing Iran 's
program.” Well, that's how it all appears on the surface, but are we being
deceived deliberately or inadvertently?
The thing that will jump at you as you read the article, is
that nowhere in it – or between the lines – is there mention of Israel
defending itself, yet the editors of the Pittsburgh Tribune who published the
article chose to headline it with this title: “Israel must be able to defend
itself.” This happens to be the robotic mantra that's often spewed by the mob
of Jewish pundits and their echo-repeaters as they plead on behalf of Israel , and
they slander their enemy of the day. Are we seeing a conversion of some kind
that is yet to reveal itself?
Other than that, the pundits and their echo-repeaters do
what they do to impress the congressional mob of brainless followers. It's a
case of the mob leading the mob to suckle the hapless country that is America for the benefit of Israel . They
suckle the country of its blood like a parasite that was raised on steroid and
cannot give up the addiction. In case you're still interested, my friend, the
Michael Rubin article appeared on March 4, 2017 in the Pittsburgh Tribune.
As if there were not enough oddities in this event, look
what else Rubin is throwing at the readers:
“The missile test Iran conducted was the first during the
presidency of Donald Trump … Israeli leaders have good reason to not trust the
dovish sounding Zarif … They rely more on the words of President Akbar
Rafsanjani … Israeli leaders remember the latter as saying in 2001 that Iran
could annihilate Israel with a single bomb … The secretary general of Hezbollah
said in 2005: 'We are able to produce atomic bombs. The United States is not more than a barking dog' …
But all of that is hogwash anyway because: 'It's worth remembering that
diplomats don't control the country's nuclear program; Iran 's
Revolutionary Guard does'”.
So you wonder, what's the purpose of this article? Why did
the author first mention the President of the United States as if to tell him:
Look here, I have a story to tell you? But after making a feeble attempt to use
hearsay upon which to build a case that has no substance, he made the point
that the whole thing was meaningless anyway because he's been talking about the
wrong actors.
Could it be that Michael Rubin is using the Jewish trick of
talking about someone by pretending to talk about someone else? Is he another
one of those who discovered religion while on his way to Damascus ? Is Michael Rubin a recent convert
to the non-Jewish realities that make the real world tick? Is he drawing the
attention of the American president to the reality that the danger to world
peace was never Iran but Israel , only Israel
and no one but Israel ?
After all, it was Israel that went out of its way – using
the body language of ambiguity, and putting to work the mouthpieces it has
cultivated around the world – to con the human race and make it believe it has
no less than 200 nuclear weapons in its arsenal. It also made the false claim
that it had the submarines to carry and launch those weapons on its enemies
anywhere they might be, and everywhere they might go around the globe to hide
from their fate.
This is why the leaders of a world that is still sane have
good reason not to take the Jews at their word. Why no one believes that
despite the claim, Israel
cannot annihilate a country – any country – with a single nuclear bomb or 200
fictitious ones. It is why the juvenile behavior of the Jews, and the moronic
nurture of that behavior by the American congress of unthinking moral
prostitutes, constitute the real danger that's threatening the continued
existence of the human race on this planet.