What's the difference between a government and a
revolutionary movement?
For one thing, the two are the antithesis of each other.
That is, a government is organized into institutions laboring to maintain the
status quo whereas a revolutionary movement is an organization that's in flux,
laboring to seize power so that it may become the government and organize
itself into institutions.
One of the indispensable institutions a government has, is a
security apparatus that's made of the courts, the various police forces and the
branches of the military. Its revolutionary counterpart has a militia of
guerrilla fighters who are loosely organized into small units with no command
and control center to keep them disciplined.
No matter how stable a government seems to be on the
surface, it has an opposition that wants to replace it. As long as the
opposition is expressed with words and not violent acts, the government is said
to be stable. But instability begins to set-in the moment that the opposition
resorts to violence to express itself. If this happens in a jurisdiction, one
of three outcomes can result. First, the violence dies and the movement behind
it disappears. Second, the violence simmers at a low level for an indefinite
period. Third, the violence grows and becomes a full blown revolution.
The acts said to be anti-Semitic currently sweeping the
United States are a manifestation of a movement that is responding to the local
and state governments which have, for all practical purposes, declared war on
their own people for the benefit of a group identifying itself as Jewish. One
of the sins these governments are committing is to use the legislatures which
are backed by the police, themselves backed by the national guard to tell the
ordinary people – who work for a living, and want to make their own choices –
they must love the Jews so much as to buy slave-labor Israeli products instead
of whatever else they prefer to buy. This confrontation has come to be known as
the effort to combat the BDS movement.
It is this war against the people – mounted by moral
prostitutes and disguised as an attempt to save taxpayers money – that is
forcing the people of several states to begin organizing themselves into units
that could eventually coalesce into a militia force to be reckoned with. So
far, the fighting units did no more than express their discontent on the
proverbial wall, thus gave the governments that chose to oppress them, the
chance to back off and end the war.
This is why the Anti-Defamation League, which represents the
Jews who benefit from the wars launched against the American people by their
own governments – has intervened. The League did not do so to help calm the
situation; it did it to pressure the federal government to spring into action
and escalate the war. It did so, previously by demanding that the mandates to
buy slave-labor Israeli products be federalized, and now by insisting that the
Federal Government take several steps to intensify the war against the people
who chose to express their discontent.
You can go over those steps when reviewing an article that
came under the title: “Words aren't enough” and the subtitle: “Trump must fight
anti-Semitism surge through actions.” It was written by the Anti-Defamation
League's Jonathan Greenblatt, and published on March 1, 2017 in the New York
Daily News.
After an introduction that dished out the all too familiar
rhetoric, Greenblatt has asked the White House to do the following:
Direct the Justice Department to launch an investigation;
giving the investigators lots of money so that they can hire lots of people.
Create a new super-agency by combining the resources of all the other agencies,
and mandate it to “mitigate” anti-Semitic threats (whatever that means.) Combine
the resources of the FBI with the local forces to train and promote
participation in hate crime statistics reporting. Address cyberhate by
centralizing the reporting of abuse.