Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Using a forked Tongue where they can get away

If you ever wondered what relationship exists between the Jews and the habit of lying, you just got lucky because two articles have appeared, offering a comprehensive illustration of what you're looking for. You may at long last find the answer to your question.

The first article came under the title: “Is Israel losing its soul?” It was written by Richard Cohen – a Jew residing in America – and published on March 27, 2017 in the Washington Post. The second article came under the title: “Israel's Next War Is Always Inevitable,” written by Larry Derfner – a Jew residing in Israel – and published on March 28, 2017 in the New York Times.

Having seen the title in Cohen's article, you expect to read a piece that will be critical of Israel but also respectful of it considering that the writer is Richard Cohen, an avowed Zionist. A split second later, you start reading the first paragraph, and you find it to be a diatribe attacking the United Nations and Saudi Arabia. And you instantly realize that no change has occurred to the substance of Cohen's views with regard to the subject he is tackling. What has changed is only the form he has adopted to make his presentation.

You're not sure at this point what to make of all that. Eventually, however, you get to read the title and first paragraph of Larry Derfner's article, and discover that the two have the same theme. It is that the Israelis now believe and have always believed that “the next war is inevitable.” From there, the writer goes on to develop the theme without deviating to tangents that distract the reader. This approach being so different from that of Richard Cohen, you wonder why a Jew writing in America is so different from a Jew writing in Israel.

It does not take Derfner long before supplying the answer to that question. He does it by revealing that “The next war must hit civilians where it hurts, Israeli minister says.” This is honesty standing as a complete reversal to how the Israelis used to present their case to the world. It is a big change; one that must have come as a result of this: “What hardly any Israeli will consider is that Israel is provoking the next war”.

That means the Israelis never worried about starting a war or killing civilians as long as the world believed the lie that the enemy started the war, and did so to kill Israeli civilians. This was happening, they used to say, at a time when Israel was killing only evil combatants. But now that the Israelis cannot sell those lies, they admit to the truth, even brag about it. And this is why Derfner took the liberty to quote Netanyahu as saying: “That is what was and that is what will be.” The Prime Minister could not have admitted to war crimes more explicitly.

But why is it that Richard Cohen and his American comrades – members of the Jewish mob of pundits – are incapable of making the change from telling lies to telling the truth … and if necessary bragging about it? We find one reason in Cohen's article. It came in this form: “The word 'apartheid' clearly does not apply to Israel. Its founding document is admirably liberal.” But unlike Netanyahu that bragged about Israel's military capabilities, Cohen bragged about this: “Israel grants its Arab minority the vote, and had a female prime minister. The United States is not there yet”.

This is a big deception because the debate is about the occupation of the West Bank where the Arabs are not allowed to vote. Cohen deliberately created confusion by switching the discussion to what is called “Israel proper.” In any case, whatever the size of his deception, it is but an atom compared to the mountain-size deception that followed. Speaking of Israel, Cohen said this: “the creation of a nation, and a culture where a century or so ago none existed.” Unwittingly, the writer just dealt his case a fatal blow.

Think about it; while trying to defend Israel against the charge of running an apartheid regime by making the Palestinians second class citizens in the country that was theirs since the beginning of time, Cohen says there was not a nation or a culture in Palestine before the advent of the Jews. You know what, my friend? The Afrikaners did not go as far as that in their denigration of the Blacks in South Africa. The European settlers of the New Worlds never said such things about the natives. But here you have the Jews saying it about Palestine, one of the crucibles where Civilization was incubated.

Now you know what to make of all that. It is that the Jews in America are pursuing two contradictory discourses at the same time: They say: “We are admirably liberal.” And they say: “we are culturally superior to Palestinians, and politically superior to Americans.” The implication is this: “Give us, Jews, privileges you would not give to someone else in the Republic.” They wish to formalize their ownership of America.