Despite being formidable predators, vultures are also the
quintessential opportunistic scavengers. They do little hunting of their own to
conserve energy as long as they can feed on what other predators leave behind,
having made a kill and appeased their own hunger.
Because all cultures find it convenient to project animal
attributes into human beings when describing the latter's character, the
scavenging characteristics of the vulture are used to analogize the dominant
trait in some people. One group often
compared to vultures is the Jews. This does not mean they eat the leftovers
discarded by other people; it means they have an eye for opportunistic
circumstances they can pounce on and exploit.
At this time, the Jews see an opportunity opening to Israel
concerning the rocky relationship that entity has had with the United Nations
(UN), the institution that adopted it as a member. Representing all of
humanity, the UN is acting like a typical parent that sees its adopted child
behave like a savage brute, trying incessantly to suffocate or devour
Palestine, the helpless native child that was alone in the crib before the
adoption of Israel.
In the ongoing conflict between a UN that has humanity on
its side, and an Israel that has World Jewry on its side, the Jews have so far
been able to use a plethora of fox-like tricks to convince one great power or
another to shield Israel as it continues to behave like the unborn shark known
to eat its siblings in the mother's womb. The last of the great powers used by
the Jews to help them get away with crimes against humanity, is an America that's
beginning to show signs it has had enough shielding the savage and culturally
primitive beast.
However, the Jews of the world believe they now see an
opportunity suddenly opening to them and to Israel . Their faith is renewed in
the ability to maintain America 's
support for Israel ,
and its continued shielding of the entity as it schemes to complete the job of
permanently doing away with Palestinians one way or the other.
You can see how they go about executing their demonic plan
in two articles that came in the same publication a day apart. One article came
under the title: “Is Nikki Haley the Alternative Secretary of State?” written
by Jonathan S. Tobin and published on June 30, 2017 in National Review Online.
The other came under the title: “No One does Anti-Israel Bias Quite Like the
UN,” written by Elliott Kaufman.
Faced with a signature behavior that says: “Jewish to the
core,” the reader can only be overwhelmed by the ecstatic joy that's gushing
out of Tobin's pen as he expresses the following at the start of his article:
“Rex Tilerson sputters in frustration. The Secretary of State doesn't seem to
enjoy being America 's
top diplomat, isolated and not getting much love from the White House. Tilerson
doesn't have much influence over US policy”.
Based on this perceived reality, Tobin opines: “Haley has
become a kind of alternative secretary of state. The length of Tilerson's
tenure in office is an open question while Haley's promising career seems to
have gotten a new lease on life. She is speaking out on issues such as human
rights, Israel, Iran and Syria in ways that make it clear the UN post is the
ideal bully pulpit … She is prepared to publicly pressure UN agencies for their
anti-Semitism while affirming the US alliance with Israel”.
Now that they painted a rosy picture of what they fantasize
ought to happen or will actually happen, the Jews left it to Elliott Kaufman to
tell what's wrong not with Israel
but with the UN, and by implication with the human race. However, instead of
talking collectively about seven and a half billion individuals, Kaufman picked
one, Richard Falk, and made him out to be the villain that represents the archetypal
non-Jewish human. Here is how Elliott Kaufman paints a portrait of Richard
Falk:
“Falk the Iran-loving, Zionist-bashing 9/11 truther. One of
Khomeini's useful idiots. An open supporter of the Palestinian struggle, and
sporting an unblemished record of such hysteria. He is equally fixated on the
supposed crimes of the Jews. He repeated the old canard that Israelis control
American foreign policy and insist on war. He has compared the Israeli
government to the Nazis”.
And Kaufman concludes with this: “The realization that Falk
was appointed because of these views helps explain why the UN treats Israel the way
it does.”