Here is a perfect example showing how Jewish pundits set up
a deception and use it as a foundation upon which to erect an entire deceptive
monument on top of it. The example came in the form of an article under the
title: “Malice on the Mount” and the subtitle: “The hate behind the latest Mideast crisis.” It was written by Benny Avni, and
published on July 24, 2017 in the New York Post.
Here is how the writer has set up a deception to serve as
foundation:
“Are they really going to start World War III over metal
detectors? Yes, it's a holy site. But so is Mecca , which has metal detectors. And the Vatican .
And many buildings in Manhattan and around the United States .
Yet the UN Security Council convened a session on this 'threat to peace and
security' – and did so behind the safety of UN metal detectors. This isn't
about metal detectors”.
He mockingly says it's not about metal detectors. But you
know what? He is correct because the Arabs never said it was about metal
detectors, even if he tried to give the impression it's what they said. In
fact, the Arab view is that Israel
has been robbing Palestinian property in the name of security ever since 1948.
Now that the Jews have decided to implement a scheme of annexation that
encompasses the entire West Bank, they realize they must first get the world
accustomed to the idea of Israel
controlling (1) the borders that the West Bank shares with Jordan , and (2)
the al-Aqsa mosque compound which is currently under Jordanian control.
By definition, to be in charge of the security of something
is to control the thing. Thus, the Arab anger is not about the metal detectors;
it's about the Israeli policy of robbing the Palestinians of their properties
under the false pretense of security. This is why the metal detectors were
brought-in the moment that an excuse to do it presented itself. So we ask: in
light of all that, what does Avni say the detectors are about?
Well, he reacts in the typical Judeo-Yiddish tradition of
not responding directly to the question. What he does instead, is throw a ton
of insults at his bête noire, President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority.
This done, he follows the Jewish tradition of shooting himself in the foot
trying to have it both ways. He does that by complaining that: “Abbas has never
acknowledged Jewish ties to the Western Wall – or any place in Jerusalem , for that matter.” And he shoots
himself a second time by wondering aloud: “Is it reasonable to expect Israeli
leaders to acquiesce to complaints at the risk of Israel 's own security?”
He thus establishes that the issue is about security.
However, whereas security is of real concern to the unarmed Palestinians who
were robbed of most everything they own over the past half century, it is fake
concern to the fully armed Jews who keep using security as a pretext to extend
their control over Palestinian properties. In fact, like night follows day, the
use of that excuse has always served as harbinger of the Jewish moves that
culminate with the grabbing of more Palestinian properties, and the annexation
of more Palestinian lands.
But how do these people get away committing this level of
criminal activities for this length of time when no one else would last a
month? They can and they do because they lived 4,000 years without a country of
their own. During that time, they acquired the experience and developed the
methods by which they infiltrate the ruling class of the countries that give
them shelter.
Once entrenched in their positions, the Jews promote their
interests at the expense of the people that welcome them into their homes. They
serve themselves handsomely not by winning the goodwill of the public; they do
it by convincing the rulers to impose their design for changing the existing
way of life on a society that will most certainly reject their vision.
As to the approach they use to work on the rulers; it is
always the same. They find out what argument sells in a given place at a given
time, and they embrace it as if it were written in their DNA. This is why they,
who invented Marxism, now masquerade as liberal democrats in the countries that
used to be authentic liberal democracies but were altered by them to now
practice a form of Jewish despotism. But they continue to call themselves democracies.