Jonathan S. Tobin took on the New York Times because he says
the newspaper does not report accurately on Iran . He ended his article by
calling this kind of reporting a sad joke. Well, I'm not going to argue with
Tobin on this matter for two reasons. First, I do not inject myself in the
fight between two jerks and second, I called the New York Times's reporting on Israel and the Arab world, especially Egypt , worse
names than a sad joke.
But if you've lived on this planet during the last few
weeks, and were exposed to American media of any kind, you could not have
missed the blizzard of congratulations that were offered to those that
encouraged the protesters in Iran, including the statements and tweets that were
put out by the President of the United States, and those who spoke in the name
of the White House.
Moreover, for every word of encouragement that was uttered
by anyone, hundreds of other words were uttered by the media types, begging America 's
elites to encourage the Iranians to protest even more. They also called on the
West to do more – not just in words – but do it via clandestine operations. And
amid all of this, there was mention of previous cyber attacks and bombing
operations that caused considerable damage in lives lost, and serious
destruction of property in Iran .
This is where I argue with Jonathan Tobin who wrote “How Not
to Report on Iran ,”
an article that was published on January 7, 2018 in National Review Online.
Before unleashing his attack on the New York Times, Tobin set the stage to
justify his attack by doing one of the jerkiest things the Jews have been doing
for half a century: They enjoy the habit of bragging about doing the things
that the world does not approve of while denying doing them in the same breath.
Look how Tobin introduced his readers to the situation in Iran :
“The ayatollahs' attempt to blame the protests on the CIA
gets a boost from the New York times. The regime made it clear there was a plot
by the CIA and its Saudi and Israeli allies. The success of the 1979 revolution
was rooted in grievances about Western responsibility for the tyrannical
monarchy then in power in Iran .
Since then, Iran 's
theocrats have resurrected the memory of the 1953 coup in which the CIA helped put
the shah back in power. The security of their regime rests on feeding a belief
that their country and Shiite Islam are under siege by malevolent outside
forces. They know that so long as Iranians are focused on America , Israel
and Saudi Arabia ,
they will continue to let their rulers get away with murder”.
This prompts the question: Why did Tobin start his article
by denying something most of the people who read his articles would know is a
lie? No doubt this is a mystery that needs to be resolved. In the meantime,
however, we must not ignore the tremendous damage that this Jewish habit is
causing, not to the Iranian targets of Tobin's misinformation, but to the
intended recipients of it. These would be his readers and the American culture.
Yes, the culture suffers, given that his readers are an active part of it.
Throwing accusations at people behind their backs in the
knowledge that they will not respond, has been a Jewish pastime since time
immemorial. But when they managed to monopolize the American media, they
discovered they can practice their habit by openly insulting those overseas who
did not bother to respond. In fact, the foreigners viewed such antics as
nothing more than the Jews engaging in their other most favored pastime:
screwing their American hosts in the head.
Thus, while the Jews were unable to change the world in
fifty years, they changed America
by imparting to it their worst cultural characteristics. And you don't have to
be a genius to see how low America
has sunk by absorbing ever increasing doses of the Judeo-Yiddish culture.
Watching a dysfunctional Congress and a journalism that has
become as shallow an institution as the televangelists that tell their flocks
the Jew is the new God they must worship – the foreigners overseas were so
frightened they decided that the time had come to respond to American
provocations tit for tat.