Just as it is natural for water to flow from upstream to
downstream; it is natural for generosity to flow from those that have much to
those that have little.
This is what happened right after the Second World War when America was
seen to have surpluses in just about everything at a time when the rest of the
world had deficiencies in just about everything. Thus, aid flowed from America to the
rest of the world, especially the European countries that were devastated by
the war.
And while Europe and the
world were rebuilding, two trends – one political and one economic – were
taking roots. They expanded with time and integrated solidly in today's
infrastructure. But they continue to evolve even now, and the signs are here that
their changing composition will have a major impact on how world affairs will
unfold as time moves on.
On the political front, the United States was deputized as
policeman of the world by the Brits, then the French and then the Jews, all of
whom pulled off masterful self-serving tricks that enriched them in good times,
and saved their hides in dire times while costing American lives and vast
amounts of wasted wealth. In time, what started as policeman became the beast
of burden that could no longer carry the burden.
It is that the weight of political responsibility brought
with it the need to reshape the financial order of the world. This necessitated
the creation of new financial institutions, and ultimately the use of the
dollar as the world reserve currency. And so, while America
reduced its military interventions around the world, it relied increasingly on
the use of its dominant position in the world financial institutions to impose
economic sanctions on the nations that violated so-called American values, and
more importantly on those that refused to toe Israel 's line.
However, with trade and commerce becoming increasingly more
globalized, what happened in one jurisdiction began to affect all other
jurisdictions. As well, America
became promiscuous in its use of sanctions against Israel 's chosen targets. That
combination caused the world to become so annoyed with America 's capricious behavior; it lined-up
behind a China
that began to develop alternatives to the World Bank (WB), the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications
(SWIFT).
The full force of this development will take time before it
is felt, but when it happens, the dollar will be the first to suffer. This is
certain to happen because the current value of the dollar is inflated by virtue
of it being the world's reserve currency. But when this privilege will be gone,
only America 's
GDP will back it. However, that GDP has already shrunk relative to the rest of
the world, and will shrink further with time. The value of the dollar will
reflect this reality, and the practical effect will be a drop in its purchasing
power. The consequences both economically and politically at home and abroad
will hit America
in a serious way, and no one at this time can predict what will happen as a
result.
With this in mind, you should now go over two articles that
appeared on the website of the Washington Institute. The first came under the
title: “Sorting out U.S. and
European Differences over Iran ,”
written by Jay Solomon and published on January 8, 2018. The second came under
the title: “On Iran ,
Trump Should Be Like Reagan,” written by Richard Goldberg and Dennis Ross, and
published on January 9, 2018.
You'll see three Jewish authors goad America to
continue practicing the capricious behavior that has annoyed the world no end.
You'll discern no logic in what they seek except that now is play time, and
they must win this round no matter the long term consequences for America , the world and even Israel .
You know what this reminds me of, my friend? It reminds me
of a lottery commercial that used to goad people to participate because “if you
don't play, you cannot win.” Well, it can be argued that this presentation made
sense because you could gamble as little as a dollar and stand to win millions.
But suppose the game was not a lottery but a call to participate in a duel
where one of the two players is certain to die. Here, life is gambled with one
chance in two that it will be lost. Would someone sane participate?
This said, is there a deal worse than that? There should not
be, but believe it or not, the Jews have managed to cook up such deals and make
them work in America .
They work because whatever the occasion, the Jews find a reason why America must
participate. When this happens – whether America
wins or loses the battle – Israel
always collects the spoils, and America
always pays the price.
The best example to mention is that of Israel getting rid of a potential rival in Iraq , and America losing standing in the
world. America lost, say the
Jewish propaganda, not because the Jews invented fake stories about Iraqi weapons
of mass destruction that did not exist, but because America failed to execute the
Jewish plans exactly right.