Developments
over the last few years provide ample reasons to paraphrase Israel's late
foreign minister Abba Eban, and say that the Jews never miss an opportunity to
do themselves in. Also worth highlighting is the observation that each time the
Jews did themselves in, they ignited the flames of antisemitism which then
turned on the fires of the incinerators.
Two
recently published articles give credence to that historical reality. One
article came under the title: “Clueless Europeans Muddle the Middle East
Again,” written by Ken Cohen, and published on February 12, 2020 in the Jewish
publication Algemeiner. The other article came under the title: “Palestinian
movement has become obsolete,” and the subtitle: “Palestinians were overtaken
by political events and thwarted by their own mistakes.” It was written by Jed
Babbin, and published in the Washington Times on February 12, 2020.
As
if to put on display an example of how the Jews are taught to conduct a debate
–– if and when they are compelled to engage in one –– Ken Cohen began his
lecture as follows: “The Europeans [should] focus on the problems on their own
continent … The institutions of Europe insert themselves into distant problems
of which they have little understanding and zero political standing”.
If
you're not familiar with the way that the Jews debate, you would think that Ken
Cohen will follow the normal procedure and justify asking the Europeans to
focus on their problems. You reckon he'll do so by showing that they are
plagued by more problems more severely than anyone else. Alas, he does none of
that.
As
to Cohen suggesting that anyone as distant from the Middle East as Europe
should stay out of the region, gives the impression that he'll want to keep the
even more distant America at bay. But reading the full article, shows that his
desire for foreign intrusion into the region involves America and only America.
And so, you conclude that the Jewish way to debate, is to make assertions that
the author will not justify. Meanwhile, you must accept what he says without
question, or he'll refuse to debate you under the false pretext that you're a
denier of the Holocaust and a virulent antisemite.
Of
the numerous other assertions made by Ken Cohen, the one that hits you in the
face like a baseball bat in the hand of a madman, is the new bogus currency
that the Jews are peddling these days. It goes like this: “The alleged
Palestinian right of return.” Do you know what this means, my friend? I'll tell
you what it means with the use of an example. It means the following:
If
someone that doesn't know the difference between a geographic map and his
asshole, is hungry for a promotion and a raise at CNN where he works, what he
can do is convert to Judaism. He’ll get what he wants from CNN, and instantly
become the proud owner of a piece of Palestine. This means, he can go to the
Jewish occupied land of the Palestinian people, push a family out of the home
it has owned since the beginning of time, and make it his own. This will happen
with the bill being paid for by Americans, and innocent people being killed if necessary,
by America’s military.
If
you tell that character, this is not how estates are inherited, and you explain
that ownership goes from parents to offspring because what counts is the
bloodline of the claimant and not his religious affiliation, the character will
ask for time so that he may consult with a rabbi or something. When he has done
so, he'll come back and accuse you of being a Holocaust denier and a virulent
antisemite. For this reason, he'll say he'll never debate you, and that's
final. What’s not final, however, is that for the foreseeable future, every
Jewish pundit and his sidekick will be rattling off the moronic phrase: alleged
Palestinian right of return.
As
to Jed Babbin, he did not waste time laying the foundation for the case he is
about to make, by rattling off the myth which goes like this: “Because of the
threat Iran poses to the Arab states, and the Palestinians' rejection of one
reasonable peace deal after another, the Palestinian movement has become
obsolete”.
Babbin
did not elaborate on that theory, because every time that such attempt was
made, the argument was brought down in flames. That's because the explanation
rests on the stupid principle that the Arabs are relying on Israel to defend
them against Iran, when the truth is that Israel had its ass kicked many times
over by the children of Gaza who were armed with nothing more than homemade
weapons. The truth is that the Arabs care about Israel as much as they care
about an alley cat prowling the neighborhood.
Despite
all this, Jed Babbin has relied on the imbecilic pattern of accusing the
Palestinians of rejecting previously offered peace deals instead of explaining
why they should accept the current deal. In fact, you can bet the farm that if
there is going to be a next time, Babbin or someone like him, will in the future,
accuse the Palestinians of rejecting the deal offered in the year 2020. He’ll
do so instead of explaining why the one that will be offered then, will have
been a good deal.