When you haven't been convicted of anything; when you
haven't been prosecuted for anything, but only got wind that you may be
investigated for a crime you may have committed, the most that you can do to
discredit the prosecutor, and be credible enough to be taken seriously, is to
make one of two arguments.
First, you can argue that because there is no prima
facie evidence allowing the prosecutor to start an investigation, this is
clearly an uncalled for witch hunt. Second, you can argue that the prosecutor
has no jurisdiction in the matter for which it is rumored you may be
prosecuted.
What happened in real life that prompted this
discussion, is that word got out to the effect that based on credible evidence
which surfaced some time ago and can be found in the public domain, Fatou
Bensouda, who is the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC), has
recommended that Israel be investigated for the likelihood that it has
committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.
And so, the Jews that have forever argued that guilty
or not, Israel must never be prosecuted for anything on account that it is
Jewish –– exploded with rage. If asked, the Jews would explain that they must
be considered above the law of man, answerable only to the laws of God. As it
happens, these are the laws that were left in their custody by the Almighty
Himself. Thus, Israel that thinks of itself as Jewish, can only be judged by
those laws, and judged in a setting that is attended only by Jews.
One of the Jews who exploded with rage at the idea
that Israel may be prosecuted, is Eitan Fischberger. He expressed his rage in
an article he wrote under the title: “ICC Prosecutor Recommend Israel Be
Investigated for War Crimes –– Why the US Should Care,” and was published on
May 5, 2020 in the Jewish online publication Algemeiner.
Fischberger contends that the move initiated by the
ICC prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, is a “miscarriage of justice.” He attacked the
ICC on both counts: lack of jurisdiction and lack of prima facie evidence. He
then warned that the precedent set by the Israeli case may be applied to
America, which also faces similar charges for its conduct in Afghanistan. Eitan
Fischberger thus implored America to join Israel in a campaign to torpedo the
work of the ICC.
Fischberger went on to reinforce the argument that
Israel must not be prosecuted. He did so by defending Israel in public while
trampling all over “due process,” instead of saving his breath for when due
process will legitimately begin in a court of law in The Hague. Worse, the way
that Fischberger defended Israel, is peculiar even for a Jew. First, he said
that the case must not proceed because it was brought by Palestine; an entity
that is not a country. He said so to a world that knows it is Israel that's
trying to prevent Palestine from blossoming into a full-fledged country, a
crime for which Israel may prove to be guilty. Worse, Fischberger made his
false assertion to the 138 countries that recognize Palestine as a country; one
that's unfortunately under Jewish occupation.
And besides, Fischberger has claimed that what the
Palestinians are saying can only be considered allegations, which makes it so
that “Bensouda is wrong on all counts,” for taking the Palestinians seriously.
In other words, Fischberger has said that the allegations are baseless. But the
man went on to say in the same breath that: “Israel has already carried out an
investigation into the accusations, and has indicted multiple soldiers in the
Israel Defense Forces for their conduct.” This is more than sufficient to prove
that prima facie evidence exists for the ICC to proceed with the case against
Israel.
But the insidious horror that's hidden behind this
stance, is the reality that the Jews are telling the world: if you investigate
us according to the laws of man, you should know we are perfect before you even
start the investigation, and you should stop right there. But if we investigate
ourselves according to the laws of God, this is another matter, and it should
not concern you.
As to the court having or lacking jurisdiction over
the matter, Fischberger said that the recommendation made against Israel by the
ICC was “politically-motivated and legally inept.” He did not say what he
understands is meant by the word politics, but he used several paragraphs to
implore America to get involved in the case, and help torpedo the ICC's effort.
In case it escaped him, this is what is meant by playing politics. So the question
to ask is this: Why all this politicking on the part of Fischberger? And the
answer is this: So that America may protect itself from being made to suffer a
similar fate. Well then, this is not just playing politics, it is conspiring
openly to commit the crime of obstructing justice.
America considers itself policeman of the world. “Good
for you,” said the Jews, “now we're going to hypnotize you and make you work to
implement our agenda. We're going to play a dirty game against the world, and
you're going to protect us by playing an even dirtier game.
This is your opportunity, America, to stand up against
what humanity considers decent, and stand up for what we consider decent.