Sunday, May 17, 2020

They jockey for position to accomplish what?

Three articles were published recently in which foreign policy as well as the matter of war and peace were discussed. All three appear to urge America it must seek to avoid committing the mistakes of the past. But the articles also show how confused America is at this time, which is a good reason for us to delve into the country's past in search for clues as to how the superpower came to be where it is today.

One article came under the title: “What does Washington Want From China?” written by Christopher R. Hill, and published on May 11, 2010 in the online magazine, Foreign Policy. A second article came under the title: “A Cold War With China Would be a mistake,” written by Richard N. Haass and published on May 11, 2020 on the website of Council on Foreign Relations. A third article came under the title: “Unrealistic threat inflation with Iran is risky,” written by Bonnie Kristian and published on May 15, 2020 in the Washington Examiner.

Here is what we need to remember while reading these articles:

For a few years, at the end of the Second World War, triumphant America became the natural leader of the world, if only because it all came about by sheer luck. This happened because the colonial powers of Europe got too greedy and began to fight each other for the spoils that seemed to dwindle in the face of an Industrial Revolution that was gathering steam, and constantly called for evermore natural resources to feed it. When the Europeans that had diminished everyone on Earth, went on to destroy each other, America alone was left standing on a desolate planet, ready to lead a world from whose migrant people it was itself made.

America sat undisputed in that position till the decade of the 1950s at the dawn of which (August 1949) the Soviet Union exploded its first nuclear weapon. This was followed 8 years later (October 1957) by the launch of the Soviet Sputnik, the first artificial satellite to go into orbit around the Earth.

It did not take long for America's latent inferiority complex to come to the surface. This difficult-to-overcome reality facilitated America's fall under the hypnotic spell of such sophisticated “world leaders” as Winston Churchill. Keenly aware of the mess that the rival powers of Europe had made of the world as they colonized it and then fought each other, Churchill had an idea: Pit America against the Soviet Union, and make himself pilot in charge of guiding the American ship of state toward the fulfillment of a British and a personal agenda.

To those ends, Churchill incited the political class in America to start the Cold War, which itself necessitated the gradual transformation of America's foreign policy and military posture. This happened, and was responsible for the rise of centers of power in America. Taking the lead and snatching powers from the political class, one center of power dabbled in foreign policy and one dabbled in military-industrial affairs.

But while this transformation was taking place in America, something serious and consequential was unfolding in East Asia. In Vietnam, that was a colony of France, the latter was taking a beating at the hands of Vietnamese freedom fighters that had decided it was time to rid the country of the in-situ form of slavery that colonization really was.

And so, the French took advantage of the softening work that Churchill had done on the Americans, and got the latter to walk into the Vietnamese quagmire while they were extricating themselves from it. Whereas this maneuvering was happening outside of America, the foreign policy group in America was consolidated itself into a solidly established institution, while the military-industrial complex was consolidating itself into a hawkish lobby to be reckoned with.

Moreover, while all of this was brewing in East Asia and Washington, the Jews thought that if Churchill could do it for Britain and if the French could do it for themselves, they too can do it for Israel, their permanent home of the heart away from America, their temporary home of convenience.

Turning thought into practice, the Jews sabotaged America's war effort in Vietnam, causing the superpower to lose and be humiliated big time at the hands of a primitive power. The Jews also worked by the method of stealthy infiltration in the manner of the Fifth Columnists, on steering both the Foreign policy establishment of America and its military-industrial complex, into implementing Israel's agenda in the Middle East.

Since that time, the Soviet Union collapsed, and for a short period of time, America reigned as the sole superpower. But then the global landscape gradually began to take on the look of a multi-polar world with China, a resurrected Russia, and a European Union challenging America economically, militarily or both.

With this in mind, my friend, read the three articles and try to determine what motivated each author to write their piece the way that he or she did.

Does Richard Haass worry about America being humiliated again in the Far East? Or does he want America to pivot back to the Middle East to protect Israel?

Is Bonnie Kristian motivated by her innate humanity or by her Christian upbringing?

Can Professor Christopher Hill knock some sense into the skulls of the crowd that finds itself at the helm of America's ship of state?