Say you work for a company, and you have a dispute with one of the managers. You discuss the matter with him, but cannot resolve the issues separating you. What do you do?
The correct thing to do is to
see a lawyer who will write a letter to the company, or directly to the manager
and make demands. He'll end the letter by asking the addressee to act
accordingly, failing which he'll have no alternative but to seek legal remedies
on your behalf. This is to say the lawyer will warn he'll sue if the other
party does not respond favorably.
Whereas the warning may sound
like a threat, it does not rise to that level. However, what can be construed
as an illegal threat, would be you threatening to sue the manager while going
through a fit of anger, instead of going to a lawyer. If there is evidence that
you threatened the manager –– such as a CCTV footage –– you can be held liable
for threatening someone. You must therefore never go too far warning of legal
action because you could give an easy case to your opponent.
Do the Jews know that? Of
course, they do. But do they refrain from breaking the law? Are you kidding?
These people thrive on breaking the law. They think they are above it, and
consider breaking it to be the prerogative they alone have. Their proof is that
they do it all the time and get away with it, which to them means that society
has accepted their claim for the privilege.
Because the Jews breaking the
law has become such a routine occurrence, nobody tries to document the
instances when this happens. At the international level, however, the United
Nations should have a record of all the times that the General Assembly and the
Security Council have reprimanded Israel for breaking the law. But there too,
the problem is that Israel literally gets away with murder thanks to the veto
that's exercised by the United States time after time no matter the gravity of
Israel’s crimes.
Closer to home, you have
agents of the Jewish organizations going on national television here in Canada,
and threatening to sue any Arab who continues to believe that Zionism is a form
of racism. Another incident that was brought to my attention is that of the
Polish publisher of a small ethnic newspaper, who wrote something the Jews did
not like. The police dragged the man out of his office, took him to the station
where he was met by a thing calling itself a prosecutor, and threatened with
criminal charges if he exercised his right to freely speak his mind ever again.
This is the quality of our so-called democracy.
There is no doubt this kind of
stuff is happening in America as well. But America being America, you must
expect that privileging the Jews has gone much farther than anywhere else. It
involves much more than the security apparatus entrapping innocent Muslims,
which is a frequent occurrence in that country. But the bone chilling part is
that things have gone as far as using the US Congress to chop the human rights
of citizens like a butcher uses a cleaver to mince a lump of meat.
A notorious example is that of
the Palestinian televangelist who committed the crime of being so charismatic,
Americans took to him by the millions. The Jewish organizations became so
alarmed, they found a human looking skunk that was biologically programmed to
be a total prostitute, so he ran for Congress and was elected to be American
legislator. The Jews had him go on the air and threaten to investigate the
Palestinian man of the cloth; and this was enough to cancel his ministry. The
pastor was never seen again.
So, you ask how else the US
Congress is used beyond the usual politics of moral prostitution, to commit the
crime of threatening the citizens of America in such a way as to serve the Jews
and/or Israel, their cherished pet project? This is a good question, and you'll
find the answer in an article that came under the title: “Investigate Frontier
Airlines for anti-Semitism,” written by Melissa Braunstein and published on
March 17, 2021 in The Washington Examiner.
The story she is telling is
that of Hasidic Jews getting on a plane and disregarding the rules and laws
pertaining to the pandemic, the way they disregarded them in New York and
caused numerous deaths that were avoidable in their own community and outside
of it. The Jews were asked to wear a mask or leave the plane. When they refused
to do either, the police were called, and they escorted the Jews off the plane.
Case closed? It would have
been if these were not Jews. But they were; and so, guess what happened next.
It literally became a federal case when the Jewish would-be passengers
complained to a Jewish State Senator who wrote to a Jewish Federal Senator
asking him to have the Congress investigate the case.
Whatever the Congress decides
to do is secondary to being seized by a frivolous case that has gained
notoriety by virtue of being about Jews.
More important that all of
this, is to think what will happen in such cases if America were to adopt the
Jewish definition of anti-Semitism. Think about that while reading the Melissa
Braunstein article.
Ask yourself, how many charges of anti-Semitism would a Jewish lawyer want to throw at the airline and its employees for doing their job? How much compensation the Jews will get for being spoiled brats. And who will ultimately pay for all that?