What is the difference in terms of mentality between the Palestinians and the Jews? That would be the Palestinians in occupied Palestine and the refugee camps as well as those of the diaspora. And it would be the Jews in occupied Palestine and those around the world.
The difference between the Palestinians and the Jews is that
wherever the Palestinians find themselves, they are acutely aware of the
reality that they live an abnormal life. Their existence is precarious in their
own occupied land as well as in the refugee camps. As to their existence in the
diaspora, they know they are temporary guests who need to be attuned to the
local conditions rather than seek to “educate” the locals about their plight,
their needs and their aspirations.
The Jews, by contrast, are indoctrinated from birth to believe
that the world was promised to them by God. Thus, anywhere they find
themselves, be that in occupied Palestine, in South Africa or North America,
they believe they are at home. They live as landlords in their own castles, act
accordingly and rule with an iron fist lest the locally recruited servants
treat them like wussies and push them around.
This being the difference between the Palestinian and Jewish
mentalities, you’ll find it normal that by and large, the Palestinians
concentrate on liberating their land, doing what is necessary in their occupied
homeland to achieve that goal, and drawing attention to their plight with quiet
humility when in the diaspora. If invited to do so, they inform rather than educate
their hosts about their situation. Above all, they listen to what their hosts
say to them.
The Jews by contrast, think of the land they stole as the
birthright they once lost but took back, and now must fight to keep for
themselves. Those in the diaspora have the duty to “educate” the ignorant
masses that know not they are the subjects of an empire caught in a war
situation. Whether or not the masses like it, they have been drafted by the
Jewish lords, and are expected to contribute all that they have to the empire’s
war effort.
The war is between the Palestinians on one side, who fight to
liberate the land that was stolen from them, and the Jews on the other side,
who stole the land. You’ll find that, wherever they find themselves locked in a
fight, each of the combatants has brought to the battlefield whatever weapons
they have. More importantly, you’ll find that they brought with them the
mentality that commands their attitude.
In North America, for example, you won’t find a single
Palestinian publication trying to educate the public, whereas the landscape is
littered with publications that classify as being purely Jewish, as mainstream
but openly pro-Jewish, as mainstream and crammed with Jewish so-called
journalists, as hostile to Muslim, Arab and Palestinian causes … and so on and
so forth.
In a publication calling itself American Thinker, which in
reality is a Jewish publication disguised as American, a diehard fanatic Jewish
writer who goes by the name Richard L. Cravatts, authored and published an
article under the title: “Being Pro-Palestinian Actually Means Being
Anti-Israel,” and had it printed on December 12, 2021.
The article is a demonstration of someone that’s suffering from
a classic case of moral dyslexia where he perceives the Palestinians as
behaving like ruthless Jews, and sees the Jews as behaving like Palestinian
victims. And so, Cravatts laments that the Palestinians are not told what they
need to know, further suggesting that everyone must be frightened by the fact
that the Palestinians are not getting the right message.
Richard Cravatts begins his discussion with the notion that,
“being pro-Palestinian, by definition, means being anti-Israel.” He fails to
realize that this view automatically establishes the assertion that since the
human race is pro-UN, it means that it is anti-Israel and vice versa. It flows
from this proposition that the real antagonists are the Jews standing on one
side of the dispute, and the human race—of which the Palestinians are but a
subset—standing on the other side of the dispute.
So we ask, what’s the dispute about in the eyes of Richard
Cravatts, anyway? And we discover that his dyslexia gets in the way of him
knowing what he stands for. Here is his problem: On the one hand, he admits
there are, “unsettled points about borders, Jerusalem, the return of refugees,
and other key issues,” all of which point to the reality that the dispute is a
war brought about by an alien Jewish force that invaded and occupied a home
known as Palestine. But Cravatts sees that what’s going on is a political
campaign in which the Palestinians are trying to regain what they lost, using a
tactic he brands as a “so-called resistance,” which he says will not advance
the political ambitions of the Palestinians running for some mythical office.
But if that’s the case, what does Richard Cravatts make of the
situation in the West Bank and Gaza where fatal encounters between the two
antagonists occur regularly? These are encounters that take place with the use
of weapons ranging from the stones that the Palestinians throw at the Israeli
tanks that come to demolish their homes, and the American-built stealth
warplanes that the Israelis use to lob precision bombs on Palestinian women who
would be nursing their babies in their modest homes.
That is an important observation because it brings out all the
factors of Richard Cravatts’s confusion. It is the blend that gets him to urge
humanity to talk to the Palestinians and have them accept the legitimate acts
of war that Israel is heaping on them, while advising that the Palestinians end
their resistance because it so terrifies the armed to the teeth Israeli
soldiers of occupation, they consider it illegitimate acts of terrorism.
Because humanity has
grown tired of telling America to tell Israel what it must do to be accepted as
an honorable member of the United Nations, humanity has stopped telling America
anything about Israel. This leaves us with only one thing to hope for: May
enough Jews like Richard Cravatts get cured of their dyslexia, and see things
as they are thus, impress upon Israel the need to end its genocidal occupation
of Palestine.