Friday, December 10, 2021

They denied the obvious thus exposed the truth

 For a long time, writers and researchers have tried to convince the intellectually dishonest politicians of some Western nations that the Jewish claim of rampant antisemitism was a ploy designed to siphon off taxpayers’ money at perpetuity. But the cowardly politicians refused to listen to the arguments for fear that they will be forced to reject the Jewish claims and be attacked for it, if not cancelled altogether.

 

Fortunately for the taxpayers of those nations, evidence came out about a multi-layered prototypical situation created by Jewish propaganda, simulating what the Jews had thought God promised them but never delivered. It was a fantasy to rival the fictional world of Harry Potter. What the evidence has shown is that there exist no Semitic converts to Judaism, any more than there exist authentic Semites suffering from antisemitism. Such realities have existed only in the fantasy world of the propaganda that was created to establish a false pattern of victimhood for the Jews.

 

These truths have inadvertently been exposed by a couple of stalwarts from the crowd of converts whose lineage does not contain a drop of the Cohanim blood, a necessary condition to establish the connection between their claim of adherence to the Jewish religion and their supposed connection to the Hebrew tribes. In the absence of that connection, a Jew claiming that he or she is a Semite suffering from antisemitism, would be making a claim as counterfeit as a three-dollar bill.

 

One of those stalwarts is Melanie Phillips who wrote an article under the title: “Double standard of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia,” and the subtitle: “Claims of moral equivalency are bogus.” It was published on December 9, 2021 in Jewish News Syndicate. The other stalwart is David Harsanyi who wrote an article under the title: “The Unmitigated Gall of Ilhan Omar,” published on December 9, 2021 in National Review Online.

 

What follows is the condensed version of a definition for the word “bigotry” that Melanie Phillips stumbled on inadvertently:

 

“Observations grounded in fact cannot be classified as bigotry, because bigotry rests on falsehoods, distortion and an eclipse of reason. That’s why anti-Semitism is the purest form of bigotry—because it is created entirely by falsehoods, distortion and an eclipse of reason that demonizes the Jewish people as well as the collective Jew in the State of Israel”.

 

Everyone agrees—more so the Jews than anyone else—that what they call occurrences of antisemitism have increased since the establishment of Israel. Why is that? The explanation is that whereas the tragedy that is the occupation of Palestine, gave the Jewish occupiers the impression that time was on their side, they were shocked to realize how wrong they were, seeing the gradual shift of humanity’s mood from sympathy for their causes to hostility.

 

It is that when a tragedy goes on for as long as the occupation, people stop listening to the arguments on both sides, and start making their own observations and their own studies … and then proceed to draw their own conclusions. It is what happened to a human race that used to buy a Jewish argument based on two principles before flipping. One, the Jews earned the right to have a country of their own where they’ll be sheltered from another holocaust. And two, every Jew is a descendant of the Hebrews to whom God promised the Land of Milk and Honey. And so, humanity concluded that the ongoing struggle was that of two peoples having equal rights to the land.

 

But the continued savage behavior of Israel, and the persistent support it has been getting from those throughout the world who call themselves Jews, convinced humanity that one, the Jews did not earn the right to steal a country from the Palestinians. And two, a convert to the Jewish religion is not a convert to the Hebraic ethnicity, thus cannot be a Semite. It flows from these realities that the claim of antisemitism that’s supposedly directed at the Jews, is a big hoax; one that lasted the longest on this Planet. And so, humanity has decided that the time had come to call the hoax a hoax. And so, here is a reminder of Melanie Phillips’s definition of the word bigotry:

 

“Bigotry rests on falsehoods, distortion and an eclipse of reason”.

 

This brings us to the article of David Harsanyi. It develops around two statements made by Rep. Ilhan Omar, which Harsanyi sees as contradictory and reflecting of a double standard because they represent two equivalent situations that should be treated equally but are not.

 

The first statement made by Rep. Ilhan Omar concerns the ability of Jewish leaders to use campaign donations at election time, to mesmerize the politicians to a point of near hypnosis, causing them to put the interests of Israel ahead of everything else.

 

The second statement made by Rep. Ilhan Omar concerns her delight that the Speaker of the House has decided to take a decisive action against a colleague of Omar who accused her of being a Muslim terrorist about to blow up a Capitol elevator containing both of them.

 

David Harsanyi says that Rep. Ilhan Omar had the temerity to think of those two situations as being different. To him, however, they must be equated because there is equivalency in Omar repeating what the Jews have bragged about for half a century, namely that they possessed “the power of the purse,” and a colleague saying that Omar was a suicidal terrorist about to blow up herself and the Capitol. David Harsanyi is asking himself: Why can’t people see the sameness in these two statements?

 

He is annoyed that reasonable people fail to see the two moral stances as having the same weight. He is also annoyed that no one takes seriously the Jewish logic which says that if you’re going to impose a punishment on the author of one, you must impose the same punishment on the author of the other.

 

Why do non-Jews fail to see the wisdom in this Jewish proposition? Without being a bigot, are they inferior to Jews or something?