When a military as small as that of Ukraine stands up to and does well against the conventional part of Russia’s military — thought to have been equal, if not superior to all of the NATO forces in Europe — something profound is revealed.
It is that during all that time, NATO
represented the overwhelming strength that people such as Clifford D. May and
other warmongers have been advocating. And yet, this condition did not represent
the “deterrent force” that should have caused Russia to chicken out and refrain
from attacking Ukraine … which was the point that the warmongers were erroneously
making all along.
And now that Russia has attacked Ukraine
anyway, Clifford May and those around him are disregarding the fact that their
theory proved false, and are saying the things which qualify them as being
insane by definition. What these guys are saying, in fact, is that they want
America and NATO to do, not just more of the same, but increasingly more of the
same so as to obtain a different result.
You can see Clifford May’s argument as
he formulated it in a “note” to President Joe Biden, written under the title: “Biden’s
National Security Strategy still unavailable,” and the subtitle: “If he
understands the threats, it won’t be what he planned.” It was published on
April 26, 2022 in The Washington Times.
So, we ask: What is it that, speaking in the name of all the
warmongers, Clifford May wants President Biden to do? Well, Clifford May first
reminded the President that he did not have an adequate National Security
Strategy (NSS) and that he should have one. He told him flatly that the new NSS
should be “significantly different from the Interim” paper that the White House
produced at an earlier date.
Then, Clifford May did something that is the essence of the
Jewish strategy, the very stratagem that has been the secret of their early
triumphs, as well as the cause of their terminal losses. I pause here for a
moment to explain this point before proceeding with my discussion:
When you study the recommendations that were made by the
Jews to America in what concerned domestic or foreign policy, they all aimed at
serving the Jewish causes directly or indirectly … which goes without saying. But
in addition to that, the Jews took credit for the few that succeeded, and
blamed the many that failed on America. Their excuse has always been that they
gave America the right advice but that America failed to properly implement
their instructions. This is how the invasion of Iraq became an American
failure, not a Jewish or at least a joint failure.
Back to our discussion. How did Clifford May propose to
take over America’s new thrust in the foreign policy moves that are yet to be formulated in view of what has transpired since Russia’s attack on Ukraine? The following
is how May proposed to do that:
“Given these developments, can we agree
that you have some serious work to do on your NSS, and that the final product
should be different from what your interim guidance suggests? And may I lend a
hand? Your NSS should be predicated on ‘peace through strength.’ That’s not
just a Reagan-esque concept. It traces back to an ancient Roman general who
wrote: ‘If you want peace, prepare for war’”.
Let’s assume that being the
soft-hearted man that Joe Biden is, he decides to give the Jews one more chance
at redeeming themselves by devising a plan that will heal America of all the
wounds that the Jews have inflicted on it over the decades. What will Clifford
May and his gang come up with?
The following are excepts, presented in
condensed form, of the advice that Clifford May has given President Joe Biden,
in his note:
“To achieve peace through strength requires
deterrence. That comes in two flavors. The more effective is deterrence by
denial. Your policy instead was to refrain from provoking Vladimir the
Terrible. However, you did attempt to establish deterrence by punishment. Secretary
of Defense Lloyd Austin has been talking about integrated deterrence. If he’s
implying a whole of government approach, that’s fine but hardly new. But count
me among those who fear he really means talking softly and carrying a smaller
stick. You’ve also been talking about a pivot toward Asia. How about dropping
the pivot and reinforcing deterrence everywhere? It’s your job to lead the
effort to revitalize NATO, possibly with Finland and Sweden coming onboard. A
growing number of analysts believe that a new Cold War is already underway. A
Sino-Russian alliance is driving the conflict. You must adjust your priorities
— not least your spending priorities. If you want to chat about any of this,
you know where to find me. Not a joke!”
As can be seen, Clifford May mentioned the newly formed
Sino-Russian alliance but neglected to mention that nuclear saber-rattling has
made its way in the discourse for the first time since Hiroshima.
Either Clifford May does not recognize that these are
escalatory trends with the potential to wipe life on Earth, or he does
recognize such a reality but does not care because he believes in the false
prophesy that when Armageddon will be unleashed on humanity, the messiah will come,
will save the Jews and will give them a renewed planet to remake as they wish.