What happens when a human weasel tells an institution such as the US Congress to believe him and disbelieve the man he beat up senseless, and left on the floor to suffer his pain alone?
Well, what happened in real life, is that the Congress
did what it was told to do. That is, it ignored the victim, left him to suffer his
excruciating agony, and asked the weasel what else it can do to please him.
Can this be possible? Did something like this actually
happen? Yes it did. You’ll believe it when you realize that the victim is
Palestine, and the aggressor is a band calling itself Jews. It is one that embraces
the myth which says that Jews were chosen by God to steal Palestine from its
indigenous people using whatever means are necessary to fully achieve the robbery
— and keep the spoils.
Because the Jews have embraced that logic, they reasoned
that when the Palestinians pushback against their aggression, they engage in a
forbidden activity. Thus, any Palestinian response to Jewish savagery causes
the Jews to run back to the US Congress. They ask to be given cash and be granted
new privileges to compensate them for what the Palestinians did. And the
Congress obliges.
Adopting a worldview such as that — indicative of how the
Jews relate to the rest of humanity — will make it easy for you to understand
the pretzel sort of logic that makes up the content of an article written under
the title: “Israel-haters Also Glorify Cop Killers,” authored by Civis Americanus
and published on January 21, 2023 in The American Thinker.
Look how Civis Americanus begins his discussion:
“The political Left talks about the
intersectionality that equates African-Americans to Palestinians who murder
Olympic athletes, and fire rockets into cities while using their own people as
human shields. It's just so woke to equate American citizens of color to the
absolute dregs of the human species. The only intersectional struggle is the
one between the world's civilized people and its depraved violent savages who
cling to the Dark Age mentality that the only way to improve one's situation is
to steal from others. Technological advancement does not necessarily equate to
civilization. Nazi Germany was very advanced technologically, and so were the
USSR and Imperial Japan. This did not stop them from committing monstrous
crimes against humanity throughout Europe and Asia”.
Here, Civis Americanus turns the truth
upside down by engaging in both acts of commission and omission. The truth is
that it was the Israelis who first bragged about killing prominent Palestinians
wherever they go in Europe. When the Palestinians responded in kind, the Jews
screamed terrorism. The writer also moans about the Gaza Palestinians who use
homemade rockets to protect their people against Israel’s attacks, carried out
with the deadly combination of F-16 warplanes and precision bombs. Americanus
also sneers at the same Gaza people for having nowhere to hide when Israel
attacks. And while doing all that, he says nothing about the Israeli policy of
deliberately building kibbutz settlements for children near the Palestinian
border to score propaganda points when a kid gets hurt in a crossfire.
In addition to swimming in that level of distortion, the
writer conveys three points that reveal how twisted his logic has become:
First, Civis Americanus complains that the Left equates
the African-American experience with that of the Palestinians. He says he
rejects this viewpoint because the African Americans won their struggle by
peaceful means despite the adversities they encountered through the centuries,
whereas the Palestinians fought back against the Jewish invaders who came to
steal their country. But the truth is that the Africans fought the colonial
invaders when they were at home in Africa. Once uprooted and taken to America,
they lost the ability to fightback. Similarly, the Palestinians fightback
against the settlers who come to invade their homes in the Middle East. But
when they are elsewhere, the Palestinians act like everyone else.
Second, Americanus contends that the only intersectional
struggle in existence today involves the world’s civilized people and the
depraved savages who can improve their situation only by stealing from others.
Clearly, the writer’s intent here is to assert that the Jews are the civilized
people who get robbed by the depraved Palestinian savages. But the observed
reality on the ground, is that it was the savage Jews who stole Palestine from
the Palestinian people — and continue to annex more Palestinian territory to
this day.
Third, Americanus observes that technological advancement
does not equate to civilization, and offers as evidence the fact that “Nazi Germany, the USSR and Japan were advanced
technologically, but this did not stop them from committing monstrous crimes
against humanity.”
Well then, if based on what Americanus says, we lump into
one basket the people whom he describes as uncivilized savages, they will have
to be the Germans, the Russians, the Japanese and the Palestinians. And if we lump
into another basket the people whom he describes as civilized, they will have
to be the African Americans and the Jews.
But if, on the other hand, we group these people based on
their behavior, we must add the Jews to the basket comprising the Germans, the
Russians and the Japanese because they have all been aggressors who stole from
others. As well, we must add the Palestinians to the basket comprising the
African Americans because both fell victim to thieving savage aggressors.