In some ways Rand Paul is more media savvy than his father,
Ron Paul ever was when the latter practiced politics. In some other ways, Rand lags behind the old man. He is more savvy because he
is more subtle, and not as brutally honest as Ron was. On the other hand, he is
less savvy because he has not yet developed a sure method by which to get the
destructive reporters off his back, something the father did a little better.
Rand Paul wrote an article in which he expresses the
travails he is forced to endure at the hands of some members of the media. The
article has the title: “Where I stand on Containing Iran” and was published in
the Washington Post on April 15, 2014. Because it would be helpful to mention
something about the state of the American media before getting into it,
consider that every profession has peculiarities proper to it when it comes to
giving off signs that something threatens it. The press is doing that now.
Two incidents should be mentioned to illustrate that last
point. The first was the time when a young woman – most likely a girl barely
past the age of puberty – stood up and asked then President Bill Clinton what
kind of underwear he was using. The second was the time when a reporter – most
probably a plant sent by the hate-generating Jewish propaganda machine – stood
up and told President Obama to say something about the subject of sexual
harassment in Egypt .
Aside from the fact that the two incidents allude to the
genitals, which is a huge preoccupation of the America culture at this time, they
have something else in common. They demonstrate that familiarity breeds
contempt. The first incident says that the young and immature in a society are
eager to know how much the powerful icons of the nation are in tune with their
daily preoccupations such as appearance, personal relationships and of course,
matters of sex. If you lower the barrier too much between those who govern and
those governed, you get this sort of embarrassing but otherwise benign moments.
As to the second incident, it demonstrates that if you lower
the barrier between those who govern, and the foreigners who say they want to
be their friends, two kinds of characters will be discerned. There will be the
good friends who will remain on their side of the fence and deal respectfully
with the host. And there will be the bad ones who will crash through the fence
and ransack the property of the host with merciless savagery akin to that from
the Stone Age.
These are the two extreme manifestations, and there exist
all sorts of shades between them. One of these is the sort that Rand Paul has
been subjected to so far. There is no doubt that the girl of the first example
got her benign idea when she sat with her peers and discussed the opportunity
she will soon have to ask the President a question. And there is no doubt that
the reporter of the second example got his malignant instruction from the
operators of the Jewish hate machine. These people work to cement the principle
that the first duty of an American President is not to look after his people
but to fulfill the needs of the Jews. And right now, the Jews need to see a
world that loves Israel and
hates all other nations, including Egypt of course.
And this is what the Jewish hate machine is doing to Rand
Paul at this time. It is beginning to shape his psychology so that a few months
from now, when he will be running for the Presidency of the United States, he
will make the independent decision of becoming their man on the campaign trail,
thus encourage the other candidates to do likewise and bite each other's back
to become the favorite dog of the Jewish master. And that master will want the
winner of the election to be his man in the White house so that the world will
know America
does not belong to the American people; it belongs to the Jews anywhere in the
world they happen to live.
The big issue preoccupying the Jewish hate machine these
days being Iran ,
this is what their hatred must cover at this time, and this is where the
operators of the machine try to maneuver Rand Paul. Their aim is to get him
into a corner from which he will not be able to come out without giving them
what they want – or else look like a total incompetent, and lose the election
to a more obedient dog.