Four American senators trying to sound reasonable write a
piece that nevertheless exposes what is wrong with America
– what has gone badly wrong with America . John McCain, John
Barrasso, John Hoeven and Ron Johnson wrote an article under the title: “It is
time for the West to move ahead without Russia ” that was published in the
Washington Post on April 25, 2014.
Beaten psychologically to a pulp by the hammering they take
on a daily basis at the hands of lobbyists representing interest groups – most
notably the Jewish and the gun masters of the buttonhole – the four senators do
not start the article by saying: here is what we must do for the good of the
country. No, this is not what they say. Instead, they draw legitimacy to what
they are about to argue from the fact that: “We recently visited Norway , Estonia ,
Latvia , Lithuania and Moldova … our allies want … they
also believe...” These are American senators who no longer even pretend to make
independent decisions; they flash the moral dependence they have developed on
others, as if showing off their badges of honor.
And what is it that the overnight allies want America to do?
They want an “enduring strategic response from the United
States , Europe and
NATO.” But the senators themselves point out later that Europe
may not go along with a plan that is, after all, a return to the Cold War.
Thus, America
is asked once again to stand sentinel protecting someone, and holding the bag
at perpetuity. So then, what is the response of the senators? It is this: “It
should be clear to all … We cannot return to business as usual.” They are
embracing the business handed to them by the overnight allies.
That was an instant demand from someone they sat with only a
few hours, and that was their instant response as lawmakers of superpower America . It
takes these people months to decide on keeping their own government from
shutting down; it takes them hours to agree to rekindle the Cold War for the
benefit of instantly made friends, and it takes them a thought – a simple
thought – to know ahead of time what they must do for Israel , and do
it without being asked. What a country!
It is obvious that the senators are disappointed at the turn
of events. Russia was an
adversary of the United States
that became a friend when the Cold War ended – or so the Americans thought –
and now Russia
is back again being an unfriendly adversary. What happened? Well, simply put,
what happened was a clash of visions. On the one hand “the West sought to include
Russia in the promise of a Europe ...” On the other hand “Putin will not compromise
his quest to dominate Russia 's
neighbors.” These are two diametrically opposed visions.
What all this indicates is that the rupture in the relation
between America
and what it thought was its new ally, is rooted in those disparate visions.
Here is the implication of the American vision: “NATO committed not to deploy
significant military capabilities onto the territory of new alliance allies,
even as it expanded.” And that is an admission by the senators that NATO
expanded by deploying military capabilities in the territories that Russia let go
at the end of the Cold War.
Even then, Russia
accepted these developments and was prepared to live with them. But then,
difficulties began to surface in Ukraine ,
the most important territory ceded by Russia . Where the West refused to
help the country pull out of its financial difficulties, Russia came up
with a 15 billion dollars loan. Meanwhile, an agreement was worked between Russia and the
West on how to handle the situation. But on the eve of implementation, the West
reneged on the provisions of the agreement, and came up with a package to
rescue Ukraine financially,
thus surprising Russia
with what amounts to a checkmate.
And throughout the time that these developments were
unfolding, the chat in the West was to the effect that Russia had “bribed” Ukraine with 15 billion dollars,
and the promise of cheap natural gas. And there is the question: What did the
Americans really think of Putin? This is what they think now and what they
thought throughout the time that they dealt with him: “...a cynical way to
build support for his corrupt and autocratic rule.” That was not very friendly,
was it?
So now, what used to be a clash of visions has transformed
into a clash of strategies. The Putin strategy as the senators see it is this:
“He may play along with Western diplomats to avoid conflict.” And the Western
strategy they want to see implemented is this: “The only thing he [Putin] respects,
and that can change his calculus, is greater strength.” In other words, they
are saying that because Russia
wants to avoid conflict, the West must provoke a change in the calculus by
making a show of force. This is the argument they are making to convince the
world they are good, and that Russia
is bad. They want the world to believe that Russia is back again being an “Evil
Empire.”
The senators go from there to saying: “We must make policy
on this basis.” And they do lay out a policy that need not be repeated here
because it has been analyzed many times before on this website when it was laid
out by its original authors, the propaganda arm of the Jewish lobby. It was
represented by such advocates as John Bolton and his like-minded members of the
sorority.
Not only does the strategy looks, sounds and feels Jewish
through and through, the promise that the senators flash to entice the American
people to bite, turns out to also be Jewish through and through. Look at the
following and blow your mind: “These actions could weaken Putin, support our
allies, strengthen the U.S.
economy, increase federal revenue and create thousands of good jobs.” Wow! Let
the good times roll. Alas, it is all as phony as promising a heavenly oasis in
the middle of hell.
So you think that the instructions given to the senators
during their overseas stopovers end here, and you would be wrong because there
is more. Here it is: “Another fact repeatedly highlighted during our trip is
that Putin is winning the war of ideas … Putin's propaganda rests on lies, but
it is effective … We have given up on communicating the truth … This needs to
change.”
The truth, they say. They wish to tell the world their
truth. But let me assure them that the more they tell their truth, the more
victories Putin will score because their truth can only be as true as the
Jewish promises they make – big fat lies.