The flesh-eating disease is one of
the most dreaded diseases known to man because it remains dormant till it
strikes; something it does without warning as if coming out of nowhere. It eats
at the flesh of the patient while still alive, and does not stop till treated
in a hospital setting – usually by amputating the affected limb. But if a more
vital part of the body is affected, the chances are that the patient will die a
horrible death.
There is now another disease that
is the moral equivalent of the flesh-eating disease. It is the mind-eating
disease which is a weapon that was developed according to a blueprint submitted
by the age old Jewish ideology. It is designed to kill not the foes of the
Jews, but designed to strip the “friends” of the Jews of their human qualities.
When this happens, the friends turn into killers and do the work that is
ordered by the Jews.
The Jewish mind-eating disease
operates on many levels inside a human culture because it is the way it can
keep the host nation in a state of high alert. This is important to the Jews
because the response to a command instructing the servant nation to do a job
depends on the nation's acceptance of its subordinate role. The more widespread
is the acceptance among the subjects and the deeper the commitment to serve
without hesitation, the better will be the job performance of the servant
nation executing the task at hand.
At this point in time, America is the
servant most submissive to the will of the Jewish masters, and the most eager
to please them. When displayed in public and seen by a non-American observer,
the symptoms of the disease cause normal people to bristle with shame for being
of the same species. To see an American legislator chide another because he
does not profess loudly enough to love Israel enormously, and would serve it
slavishly, is as offensive to normal people as watching a human animal telling
another: I gave the master my wife and children to rape, and he honored me by
raping them. Why are you reluctant to do the same?
To see what else these people will
do to please their masters, you may read the New York Times editorial that came
under the title: “Reining in Egypt 's
Military Aid,” published on October 5, 2014. If you begin with the principle
that a sound mind is an integrated mind … meaning that such mind has one set of
internally produced laws it applies in all situations, you will have to view a
mind as being diseased if it breaks this rule to judge all matters according to
a double standard.
When reading the editorial of the
New York Times, you will realize that the editors are discussing the peace
treaty between Egypt and Israel that America has brokered. To reward
them both and to encourage them not to break the treaty, America offered an
economic package to each; an offer that is itself grotesquely unfair given that
Israel with less than 10 percent the population of Egypt has been receiving
almost four times as much. This means that on a per capita basis, Israel has been receiving something like 40
times as much as Egypt .
But that is beside the point because we are talking about the editors of the
New York Times and no one else.
What are they saying that
indicates they have been affected by the Jewish mind-eating disease? Before
considering that, the readers should know that the people of Egypt want to do away with this so-called
program, and wish instead to forge a normal trade and commerce relationship
with America
such as they have with most other countries. Look now how the editors of the
Times began their discussion: “Failing to make significant cuts to the program
would be indefensible.” Did they give a reason for that?
Yes, they did. It is this: “The United States is battling extremists in Iraq and Syria
… Egypt 's
authoritarianism could persuade a number of its citizens that violence is the
only tool they have to fight back.” In other words, they say that America battling extremists is not the same as Egypt battling extremists because Egypt 's action will persuade people that
violence is a tool they can use to fight back, whereas America 's
action will turn the extremists into purring pussycats. Unless, of course, Egypt decides to join America in a coalition to battle
the extremists at which time the world will be filled with extreme pussycats
produced by the AmerEgypt alliance. Neat huh! Even a six-year-old would
appreciate a story like this.
Now a burning question: From where
did the editors of the Times get an idea like that? Now a mind boggling answer:
They got it when America
started fighting the Taliban of Afghanistan, and the Jews advised its W.
President that the moral clarity of the Jewish ideology of ambiguity obligates
him to call Hamas a terrorist organization. This will allow Israel to
declare open season on the Palestinians under the pretext of fighting Hamas, an
act that will not stiffen the resistance but will turn all Palestinians into
meowing pussycats. Or at least, that was the promise.
And so, Israel
has declared open season on the people of Palestine ,
slaughtering them by the thousands at regular intervals without the editors of
the Times ever advising the American administration to reconsider its aid to Israel given
that to neglect making significant cuts to the program would be indefensible.
And since that is what the editors
said about Egypt which –
unlike Israel
does not engage in apartheid or genocide – the double standard shows its
unmistakable colors. And this says that the Jewish mind-eating disease has been
eating at the minds of the New York Times editors.