Look at this: “U.S. isolation is bad policy, even
if Americans say they want it.” It is the title of a column written by Michael
Gerson and published on October 13, 2014 in the Washington post. The sentence is composed of
two distinct parts separated by a comma. The parts are nevertheless related to
each other by a history that goes back centuries.
The first part of the sentence: “U.S. isolation is bad
policy” has roots in the British effort – started long ago, and then led by
Winston Churchill – to turn America into the workhorse that will do Britain's
bidding as if the New World had remained a British colony. The second part:
“even if Americans say they want it” is vintage Jewish philosophy of autocracy
disguised as democracy.
Oblivious of the history that led him to absorb – by
osmosis, by indoctrination and by drill – concepts that should have been alien
to the natural character of Americans, Michael Gerson is championing these
concepts to the detriment of his countrymen. The result is that he is now
playing a game about which Britain
is having second thoughts, and the Jews are confused as ever about it.
It is the interplay between America 's need to fulfill its role
in world affairs, and the need of its people to see it take time out that
creates the arguments used by some people to pull the country into the moral
and political quagmire where they are dragging it. To get a sense of how all of
that came about, we need to look at the relevant historical events that brought
the situation to where it is today.
World War Two happened after a long history of rivalry
between the newly industrialized European powers. The conflicts escalated when
the parties began to eye the natural resources they saw in the rest of the world,
and they needed to feed their local industrial revolutions. The parties
competed for those resources, and by the time that the two main powers, Britain
and France, had carved out big chunks of the world for themselves, the Germans
had waken up and were becoming an industrial colossus that scared the now
overextended and stagnating twosome.
To make sure that Germany does not overtake them, the
two made peace between them and then enlisted World Jewry to help them play the
most Jewish of the dirty tricks. It was to humiliate Germany
and force it to accept the humiliation in writing via a treaty that was signed
in Versailles , France Germany
acquired two main enemies: the Anglo-French alliance and the Jews. It was
therefore inevitable that it should work to overcome the humiliation; something
it did by developing, without cheap resources, an industrial superiority that
surpassed by far the industries of Britain and France; and by developing a
philosophy of racial supremacy that rivaled the Jewish claim to being chosen by
God.
Gerson starts the column in a manner that has the Star of
David stamped all over it. He comes down in favor of autocracy in the argument
“democracy-versus-autocracy” by speculating that if America's leaders had done
during the Second World War what the public wants them to do now (which is to
mind America's business) the Nazis would have occupied London. Bingo! With the
stroke of a pen, democracy loses, Jewish autocracy wins, and no one had to
start a revolution or conduct a civil war to get there. It is a Jewish miracle.
And there is more that's Jewish in the Gerson column. It is
a pretense expressed in this form: “disengagement was followed by expansion of
the Islamic State in a vacuum left by U.S.
inattention, and then by an outbreak of Ebola in West
Africa .” It is as if an attentive America could have wiggled its nose
– and abracadabra – the Islamists and Ebola would have been vanquished into
nonexistence.
But this did not happen because: “Americans have generally
gotten what they wanted on foreign policy issues,” says Gerson. That is, they
wanted the country to mind its own business. However, given the new
developments, the question becomes: now what? Now, says Gerson, the fickle
Americans have decided to: “ruthlessly punish those who implemented their
will.” All of which says that America
must do what Churchill drummed into its head:
consider itself the policeman of the world, go out in the world, and do
its job.