What is bad news for one man can be good news for another.
More specifically, some people will come to believe that the rupture between
the United States of America
and Israel
is bad news, while others will come to believe that it is good news. There are
many reasons why either camp will hold to the opinion that suits it, but one of
the reasons will carry a meaning that is more profound than any of the others.
Since the beginning of recorded history the Jews have fled one
place and sought refuge in another because the people in the place from which
they fled discovered how destructive they are, whereas the people in the place
that gave them refuge did not fathom how bad someone can be. It is like a
haggard knocking at your door, begging to give him shelter in the garage or the
woodshed in the backyard for the next couple of days till he gets on his feet
again, and can resume his journey away from here.
The neighbor warns you to turn him away or at least be
careful and keep a close eye on him because he will be tempted to ravage the
house, assault the children and eat your cat. But you laugh off and shrug the
suggestion; and you take the haggard in. Before you know it, he will have
ravaged the house, assaulted the children, ate the cat and ate the dog too.
Aware of what the Jews will do to them if they get to be
nice to the Jews, many in Europe and elsewhere
in the world have formulated a kind of litmus test by which to vet the people
who run for office in their countries. This is how they ascertain that the
people who seek a position of leadership do not have Jewish in their
background. What motivates them is the thought that having even one Jew in
government is like having a deadly virus that will multiply and take over the
house, the children, the cat and the dog. And so, out of caution, they will
want to have nothing to do with Jews. And that's that.
But human beings being humane by nature, there is always
someone who will stick his neck out and protest the treatment of Jews in a way
that is different from someone else. Such people will want to see clear and
irrefutable evidence – not that there are bad individuals among the Jews;
everyone has some of those – but that the Jews as a group will turn out to be
destructive for the country. In effect, they will want to see the example of a
country that went down the drain due to the activities of the Jews in it.
And this is where the example of America will come in handy. The bad
news describing how superpower America
was taken from its most glorious moment to its most humiliating time will have
become the good news to convince the doubters that Jews are a destructive
element every society must do what it can to avoid.
Of course, history lives in the history books. It also lives
in the memoirs, the video clips, the sound bites and what have you. But nothing
will be more convincing as to the role that the Jews have played in the
destruction of America
than the full display of the opinions expressed by the opinion makers themselves.
People like the editors of the Wall Street Journal and other publications; and
people like columnist Ian Tuttle writing in National Review Online (NRO) or
another publication, will do more to expose the full dimension of the Jewish
doings that demolished America, than any other piece of evidence.
And the readers can check this out for themselves by
reviewing the Journal's editorial that appeared under the title: “Obama
Belittles Israel ” and the
subtitle: “The latest snubs and sneers won't help U.S.
interests in the Mideast .” It was published on
October 31, 2014. Also on that day, NRO published Tuttle's column which came
under the title: “Mideast Chickens Coming Home to Roost” and the subtitle: “The
Obama administration is incapable of imagining that it might be wrong.” They
are but a small example of what has been going on lately in the print and the
audio-visual media.