What do American patriots want for America ? A
fierce debate on this subject has been raging for several years, and the matter
is no clearer today than the muddied waters which the Jewish commentators call
“moral clarity”.
That term was injected into everyday parlance when the Jews
exploited the tragedy of 9/11 and established a new principle that turned out
to be a killer albatross around America 's
neck. The Jews put it there by slapping the atrocious Jewish logic on W. Bush
as they argued this principle: “When al-Qaeda hit America , the W. called it a
terrorist organization and hit back. By the same token, Palestinian kids under
military occupation must be named terrorists – not freedom fighters – when they
fight for their freedom.” And the W. uttered a brainless amen to that.
From that beginning, the Jews kept on adding to the
principle, weaving a whole network of principles around America like a
spider weaves a cocoon around a fly before sucking its juices.
They fused the 'name-a-terrorist' principle to an earlier
one, and made it so that they and Israel could now have it both ways.
The earlier principle was to the effect that Israel was so much apart from
everyone else; it could not be compared to anyone. But now that Israel was compared to America 's
response to al-Qaeda, it was necessary to make a modification.
The fusion of the two principles produced this logic: when
someone is given an endowment, Israel
must – in the name of fairness – be given a comparable endowment. But when Israel is given
and endowment, no one should be given a comparable endowment because that would
encourage jealousy. The result of this fusion of principles has been that America was mobilized in its entirety to serve Israel , only Israel
and no one but Israel .
That is how – from this point on – having it both ways
became the double-standard governing America 's
handling of all matters concerning Israel and the Jews. In addition,
because it is as hard in America
to criticize Israel or the
Jews as it is to criticize the dear leader in North Korea , the American people
are made to drink a daily dose of poisoned double-standard in total silence.
Also, because it is as easy everywhere in the world to criticize Israel and the
Jews as it is to criticize the Nazis, the peoples of the world breathe the
fresh air of freedom at a time when the Americans – who used to enjoy the same
privilege but no more – can only yearn for days long gone when they too could
breathe freedom as they listened to bells ring the joys of liberty.
The consequence of the new American realities is that the
peoples of the world witnessed that evolution, and the nations of the world
have adapted to it. You can see how all that is working in an article which
came under the title: “Trump's First Foreign Policy Win Could Be in Syria,”
written by David Pollock and published on January 19, 2017 on the website of
the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Look at the deep sense of reversal of fortunes that's
encapsulated in Pollock's opening paragraph: “If this sounds like a Borat joke,
it isn't. Russia
is convening a round of Syrian peace talks to which it invited the incoming
administration.” That's the sad story, told in two simple sentences. It's about
an America that used to be
the conductor of the orchestra, now invited to play second fiddle in Russia 's
orchestra.
At this point, the Jews saw the need for one more principle
to be fused with the earlier ones. They appealed to the patriots of America by
telling them that to be patriotic was to talk tough to everyone in the world so
that “we be feared by our enemies, and trusted by our friends”.
That mentality being of the nineteenth century gunboat
diplomacy, it failed pathetically in the twenty first century. In fact, it had
the opposite effect in that Russia
became the beneficiary of the failure. And so will benefit every rival that
will challenge America
in the future.