Monday, January 30, 2017

From Melvin Weinberg to Lee Smith

Can the Jewish establishment wave a magic wand and make America destroy what little credibility it has left?

The sad story of the rising Jewish influence in America made the posing of that question inevitable. This is the new reality because it is becoming increasingly clear that the Jewish influence caused two things to happen simultaneously. It caused America's points of strength to diminish unexpectedly, and caused foreign powers capable of challenging America to grow before their time. What happened was that in their quest to implement their agenda, the Jews employed a two-pronged strategy that proved lethal to America.

On one level, the Jews convinced America's officials to publicly say the things that alarmed the people who were listening overseas. Hearing America say it will never allow someone to get strong enough to challenge it, forced rising powers such as China, Russia and Iran to accelerate their economic and military developments. On another level, the Jews convinced America to do the things that sapped it of its strength. This happened because in going around the world to change the regimes that the Jews did not like, America exhausted its military and depleted its treasury while achieving nothing more than allow worse regimes to replace those it destroyed.

What this history reveals is that the magic wand in the hand of the Jews had been their ability to convince America's officials to say the wrong things at the wrong time for the wrong reasons – time after time after time. This done, they were able to convince those same officials or different ones to go ahead and do the wrong thing just because America committed itself to doing it. But how did the Jews develop the ability to convince American officials to damage their country time after time?

The answer is that the Jews have a formula they use every time that the cycle brings them to square one. This happens when they find themselves powerless and in need to “reload” so to speak … which happens to be the point where they find themselves at this time. And so, they responded by producing an example we can look at and draw conclusions. It is an article that came under the title: “Gabbard's Assad Trip–Courtesy of an Anti-Semitic Middle East Organization,” written by Lee Smith and published on Jan. 26, 2017 in the Weekly Standard.

You can see the answer to the earlier question right there in the title of the article. It says that the method which the Jews have been using to develop an ability to convince American officials of just about anything had been to accuse the people who stand in their way of anti-Semitism.

Look how Smith begins to prosecute the case: “House Representative Tulsi Gabbard admitted that she met president Bashar al-Assad on her fact-finding trip to Damascus.” The writer's use of the word “admit” conveys the notion that this American legislator did something wrong. He implies that she knows it, and may be ready to apologize for meeting Assad. He didn't say so loudly, but you can almost hear him complain: She met Assad without obtaining prior permission from the Jews, or getting instructions from them on how to handle Assad.

Instead of explaining that no one is required to obtain permission from anywhere when they go to meet with Netanyahu – who happens to be the occupier of Palestine and butcher of Gaza – Lee Smith tries to justify his attack on Gabbard by making it sound that (1) her visit to Syria was a “cloak and dagger” operation; (2) Assad is so bad; to meet with him is to commit an evil act, and (3) the organization that Gabbard associated with for going to Syria is a bad one. Here are the examples:

1. Smith says that Gabbard made a hard to believe claim about her original intention not to meet Assad, but then met him. And you're supposed to think there is a wicked mystery here.

2. He says that Assad teamed up with many foreign allies and killed 400,000 of his own people. And you're supposed to think this is worse than anything Netanyahu did.

3. He says the organization that paid for Gabbard's trip to Syria also paid for the one that Dennis Kucinich took to Syria and made a contribution to his campaign. It is a bad organization, says Smith, because it is anti-Semitic and supports Israel's enemy, Hezbollah.

Never before the decade of the Seventies did one ethnic group harass another group in America. And then it happened that a Jew named Melvin Weinberg started the trend by concocting the Abscam scandal, meant to entrap the Arabs and their friends, but managing instead to establish their innocence while unmasking the corruption that's common among the Jews and America’s elected officials.

Rather than stop here and learn to be civilized, the Jews who find themselves in control of the media, have morphed their method of harassment to take advantage of the freedom of the press which allows them to be as nasty as ever, yet be protected by the first amendment. And so they continue to try hurting both the Arab citizens and the American legislators they dislike, using such publications as the Weekly Standard.

Will the Jewish establishment be allowed to continue in this vein? Or will it be told publicly and in no uncertain terms it must learn the civilized way of doing things, or be reminded after each infraction it is begging for all the Jews – the guilty and the innocent – to be punished the way they have been punished since the beginning of time?