If America
has any obligation to prisoners in another country or another entity; it is to
the Palestinian prisoners who are incarcerated in Israel .
It is that America
is financing the continued act of war which is maintained by Israel against the people of Palestine , a condition known as the
occupation. Given that resistance to occupation is the duty of every citizen
that's able to do his part, every Palestinian that's incarcerated due to his or
her participation in the resistance is considered a political prisoner. The
jails of Israel are full of
those, and America
that is the self-declared “no daylight” accomplice, must bear full
responsibility.
By contrast, any foreign or domestic prisoner incarcerated
in a country that's minding its own business and occupying no one – is a
regular prisoner that's no different from the two million or so who are
incarcerated in American prisons. By calling regular prisoners in a foreign
country political prisoners, you also call those in American prisons, political
prisoners. Since no one is supposed to do that, it follows that when the mob of
Jewish pundits agitates on behalf of regular prisoners anywhere in the world,
it does so to play politics with this sensitive subject. But why does it do it?
The reason why the mob of Jewish pundits plays that game is
no mystery. This becomes clear when we realize that the Jews have paralyzed
much of America
by politicizing many aspects of life in it. They managed to do so by shutting out
everyone and monopolizing the debate. They try, at this time, to do the same
with the parts of American foreign policy they have not yet monopolized. Here
too, their aim is clear: It is that when they paralyze something, they open the
door for themselves to get in. Once in, they take over the thing and make it
work for them and for Israel .
That's what they wish to do with the parts of America 's foreign policy that
remains out of their reach at this time. It is as simple as that.
You can see how Jackson Diehl is playing his part in that
demonic game. He wrote: “How Trump could lead on human rights. Really,” an
article that was published on May 14, 2017 in The Washington Post. At a time
when thousands of political prisoners in Israel
have succeeded to draw world attention to their plight with a hunger strike, Diehl
is seeking to deny them the status of political prisoners by bestowing that
classification on the regular prisoners elsewhere in the world, including America . In so
doing, Diehl has turned reality upside down in a manner that makes “Alice in Wonderland”
sound not so curiouser by comparison.
The remaining question which begs an answer is this: What do
they call the prisoners in Israeli jails? Believe it or not, they call them
terrorists. Why is that? Because they accuse the Palestinians of fighting
against the invading force that's occupying their Palestine . Don't you consider this to be odd?
Yes indeed; it is odd especially that when the Americans, French, Germans or
any of the NATO forces go out of their way to fight for the “freedom” of
others, they call the exercise upholding the values of the “free” world. The
odd part that's implied by that screwy logic is that you're not supposed to
fight for your freedom. You must call on them to fight for you … but you're not
supposed to fight for yourself.
Let's see: Did anyone call, terrorist, the French Resistance
that was headed by Charles de Gaulle? No; apparently not. Did anyone call the
Russian troops that defended Stalingrad ,
terrorists? No; there is no record of that. Did anyone call Nelson Mandela and
his team, terrorists? Only a handful of dogs pretending to be humans. Did
anyone call Robert Mugabe and his team, terrorists? Only a handful of hyenas
pretending to be human.
Did anyone call General Giap and his army, terrorists? No,
because the Americans had not yet been contaminated by the Judeo-Yiddish culture.
Did anyone call Winston Churchill and his military, terrorists, for fighting
them in the air, on the seas and on the land? Maybe the Nazis did; who knows?
Did anyone call the American soldiers who shot at the Japanese planes during
the Pearl Harbor blitz, terrorists? The bet is
that if you give it enough time, you'll hear the Jews say it.