In the span of four days between April 24 and 27 (inclusive)
of the year 2017, tens of thousand of words were written to promote the new
Judeo-Israeli agenda, and tell America
how to implement it.
Having realized that the world has changed too much for the
old agenda to have any chance of being enforced at this time, the Jewish
establishment, known as World Jewry, has fashioned a new agenda and has advised
its operatives to start working on it. The outlines of the agenda may look new
but the parts from which it is made are basically the same old ones … perhaps
with minor modification on some of them.
Of the dozens of articles that were written, and the
presentations that were made, four articles are discussed here because they
represent most of what was said or was repeated or was echoed in any
publication. In fact, two of those articles draw attention to the hearing that
was held by Senator Lindsey Graham and discussed just yesterday on this site
under the title: “Michelle Dunne, PhD
in economic Ignorance”.
One of the articles
was written by Emily Tamkin under the title: “Time to Rethink the U.S.-Egypt
Relationship, Experts Tell Senate,” published on April 25, 2017 in Foreign
Policy. The other was written by Jennifer Rubin under the title: “Our Egypt aid
policy is out of touch with reality,” published on April 27, 2017 in The
Washington Post.
As to the remaining
two articles, both were published on April 24, 2017. One came under the title:
“Does Egypt Need an FTA with the United States ?” It was written by
Haisam Hassanein and published on the website of the Washington Institute for
Near East Policy. The other came under the title: “A boost for U.S.-Israeli
ties” and the subtitle: “Trump's Washington
applauds the Christian commitment to the Jewish state,” written by Paul Miller
and published in The Washington Times.
In addition to demonstrating that two dogs or a dozen of
them barking the same lie do not embellish it, Emily Tamkin is demonstrating
how ignorance is transmitted from one dog to another. Look at this passage: “In
the 1970s, when Washington helped nudge Moscow out of Egypt ...” This is as ignorant as
saying that the Chinese nudged the Brits out of the American colonies. It is a
lie that's shamelessly repeated under different versions.
The truth is that having decided the time had come to
liberate the Sinai, President Sadat did not want Washington
to use the excuse of Soviet advisers being in Egypt
to come to Israel 's
rescue. So he told the advisers to leave. This done, he sent his army to mop up
the Sinai. But guess what; America
came to Israel 's
rescue anyway. Well, that's old history, but the mutilators keep coming with a
new version time after time. A laughable one has it that Henry Kissinger
engineered the ouster of the Soviets from Egypt .
Jennifer Rubin is a more serious gal than Emily Tamkin. In
fact, she did not make a mistake as grotesque, but she missed out on something.
She should have pointed to the testimony of the clown that's Elliott Abrams,
and reminded the readers that America lost big time whenever the Senators
listened to a witness reassure them that nothing will happen if they do as he
says. Abrams made this kind of assurances during the Lindsey Graham hearing,
yet Jennifer Rubin neglected to warn that he'll blame anyone but himself when
the inevitable question will be asked: Who lost Egypt ?
From all of the above, we deduce that the Jews wish to
repeat the stunt they pulled six decades ago when they convinced John Foster
Dulles to commit a mean act by pressuring the World Bank to deny Egypt a vital
loan. It turned out that buying off Dulles was the first Jewish step in an
elaborate plan that eventually gave them the control of America . But
sensing that the current set-up is about to change, the Jews are trying to
repeat the old performance. So the question: What booby-traps do they have in
their new plan?
To get a glimpse of what the plan may contain, we look at
what the Jews fleshed out under the name Haisam Hassanein. It is a name that
conveniently sounds Muslim, but the content of the article has the Star of
David stamped all over it. In essence, the article says that Israel should be given the moon – not because it
will perish without it, which is the truth – but because things are horrible in
America and in Egypt . To
understand all of that, we need to recall some of the background.
Fearing that the American people will discover that Israel could not survive a day without American
help, the Jewish establishment reasoned that sooner or later, the taxpayers
will deduce that America is
helping Israel
commit horrible crimes against humanity, and will demand an end to this
criminal setup. And so, the Jews created a massive fantasy about Israel being a
start-up nation with all kinds of innovations happening there; things that the
world is paying good money to buy. The aim was to create the illusion that Israel is doing what it wants because it relies
on itself and not on the help that's coming from America .
That ruse worked for a while but is wearing thin. In
addition, all the pimping that America
did for Israel
to convince other nations to do business with it came to very little. Only Jordan and Egypt
agreed to go along with the plan known as Qualified Industrial Zones (QIZ), in
which products from those nations enter America duty free, saving them
between 25 and 40 percent of its value. Pretending that Israel contributes to the content of the
products, the Arabs hand Israel
half the money they saved. It is legalized influence peddling in return for
kickback anyway you look at it.
The Egyptians signaled their disgust at this system, and
made it clear they want out. America
agreed to begin discussing a bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) to replace
it, and the Jews panicked. This is why they wrote that article, and had
Hassanein sign it. What the Jews are doing in the article is pretend to be the
American government negotiating with Egypt , and telling it why they will
not have an FTA. They are also pretending to be the US Congress, explaining why
it must nix the agreement. And they are pretending to be the US negotiators of FTA, telling Egypt it should
stick with QIZ and forget about FTA.
Considering that things have changed, the Jews realized they
need a new method by which to tighten their grip around America 's
throat. The story that Paul Miller tells in his article, shows that the Jews
discovered the power of religious fanaticism. And so, they blackmailed a number
of Christian pastors, forcing them to join in the formation of a lobby group they
called Christians United For Israel (CUFI). Working hand in hand under one
roof, Christians and Jews put down an agenda for Israel , and told the Congress to
implement it.
If the Jews succeed in achieving what they fantasize, America will turn Egypt into a large agricultural
society that's also engaged in low-tech industries. The half dozen silicon
valleys in Egypt
currently producing the innovations that the Jews can only dream of, will be
dismantled. The country will have no military to speak of, and will rely on America and Israel to defend it.
Convoluted agreements will be forged between Egypt , America
and Israel , the purpose of
which will be to transfer to Israel
half the profit that Egypt
will make when selling something to America . In time, this principle
will be expanded to apply to everything that Egypt exports to any country.
Do the Jews really believe they can realize a project that
comes close to this lunacy? Perhaps not. But if they don't, the alternative
will have to be a return to the 1960s when the relations between Egypt and the US were strained and close to
rupture.