There is no one with an IQ above that of a cockroach who
does not view the Congress of the United States of America , as the
crown achievement of the Gods of uselessness.
And there is no one with an IQ above that of a fruit-fly who
does not view the leaders calling themselves Jewish, as the crown achievement
of the Gods of ineptitude and corruption.
And yet, it is from the Jewish leaders in the United States of America
and elsewhere that voices of discontent rise in denunciation of the institution
that is the United Nations (UN), accusing it of uselessness, ineptitude and
corruption. You can see an example of this in the article that came under the
title: “Fixing the United Nations,” and the subtitle: “The U.N. will never be
what it was meant to be, but it could be less bad.” It was written by Clifford
D. May and published on September 12, 2017 in The Washington Times.
We must ask the question: against whom or what are we
comparing the Congress of the United
States of America or the Jewish leaders or
the United Nations? Well, Clifford May is comparing the UN against the goals it
set for itself when created “in the wake of World War II.” These are (1) to
prevent wars; (2) to protect human rights and (3) to promote social progress.
And so, Clifford May argues that the UN proved useless, inept and corrupt in
all these areas.
As to the question of war and peace, we must not forget that
the UN was created to replace the League of Nations in the wake of a World War
II that happened only 22 years after World War I, itself the war that the League of Nations failed to prevent. Well, the world has
now lived 72 years under the auspices of the UN without experiencing World War
III. This would be 22 years of relative peace plus another 50 years since World
War II. And this must count as a huge success for the United Nations.
As to the twin subjects of human rights and the promotion of
social progress, they must be discussed together because striking the right
balance between them has been the preoccupation of both wise people and
charlatans even before the development of human reason, believe it or not. In
fact, the mothers of higher primates such as monkeys were observed to restrain
their little ones when they courted danger. And yet, those same mothers would
push away the offspring that had grown enough to be on their own, and yet tried
to remain under the care and protection of their mothers.
And there is the case of the Alpha males that were observed
to discipline the little ones that got too rambunctious at siesta time. All of
this says that the monkeys know how to strike a balance between the rights and
obligations of the ones they have under their care. Whether this is the product
of instinct or reason will have to be determined when we know more about how
the brain functions. But for now, we must accept those realities as being a
part of our evolutionary heritage.
The roles played by the primates are also played in human
societies from the nuclear family to the nation, be that a kingdom or a
republic. But in the same way that two mothers may differ as to where the line
must be drawn between restraining a child and letting him loose; and in the
same way that two fathers may differ as to how severely a child must be
punished for a given offense, governments differ as to where the line must be
drawn between allowing permissiveness to take hold, and insuring public safety
for the citizens.
That choice is made when a society decides on how to
organize itself. And self-organization is done because pooling the multitude of
individual efforts into one enterprise achieves more than the sum of the
individual efforts. This is the way to make the kind of progress that benefits
all. But pooling the efforts also means expecting to share the fruits of the
enterprise. And the way that the sharing is done invokes the question of
fairness, which is where trouble begins in human societies. Because we are not
a beehive where different bees naturally play different roles and get rewarded
differently, human beings wish to be treated equally no matter their
circumstances. And most of us would fight to make this happen, however
difficult it may prove to be.
In general terms, this has been the evolutionary process
that has guided the human drama for perhaps ten thousand years. But no dramatic
plot is ever free of one or more subplots that add sizzle and intrigue to the
storyline. And this is where the tales of exploitation, slavery, ethnic
cleansing and genocide have shaped the main plot, causing it to take unexpected
directions.
Every country has experienced one or more of those tales.
After tremendous upheaval, most have gone beyond them, and are now making a
genuine effort to become perfect societies. But there is an exception to the
rule; the ones calling themselves Jewish leaders.
This is what you'll see reflected in the Clifford May
article. He says that the UN has done worse than fail; it “has become corrupt.
Its moral compass broke. It is poorly managed. Misconduct is rampant.” Well, we
can only compare that to the management of the United States while taking into
account the different mandates under which the two operate.
Whereas the US
represents only 4.25 percent the population of the globe, when it comes to
making the “political sausage” regarding the delivery of Health, Education and
Welfare (HEW), the UN can only be admired for what it has accomplished in these
fields worldwide. The US
would win praise if it delivered half as much for its people.
Having prevented World War III from happening despite the
dozens of small wars that the Jews have started in the Middle East, and the
incitement they voiced by which America
started dozens of wars in the past seventy years around the globe, it must be
said that Clifford May is being ignorant or malicious, criticizing the UN in
this field. As to HEW, the stellar performance of the UN in these fields has
raised literally billions of voices worldwide in praise of the UN. Thus, the
lone voice of Clifford May criticizing the UN, comes like the disapproving
spraying of a skunk trying to stop a cyclone of human approvals.
But given that the Congress is paralyzed due to the
handiwork of Jews, and that the UN is functioning well despite their criticism,
what is it that's bothering Clifford May about the UN? Here is what's bothering
him: “It's time to end the campaign to delegitimize Israel ”.