If you ever wanted proof that when the Jewish leaders shed
tears––talking about the Holocaust––they shed crocodile tears, check the
meaning of the word “hackneyed.” It means (banal, commonplace, old-hat, shopworn,
stock, threadbare, timeworn, tired, trite and well-worn,) according to the
dictionary I consulted.
It is that Jackson Dielh, who is a columnist at the
Washington Post, also happens to be a member of the mob of Jewish pundits, and
an accurate reflector of the real Jewish mood. And so the best way to gauge the
mood of the Jewish leaders is to catch Jackson Diehl when he has the pants of
self-awareness down. And this is how you'll determine if the tears he is
shedding at any moment are real, or they are of the crocodile variety.
Well, it happened that Diehl had his pants down on September
18, 2017 when he wrote his latest column; one that came under the title: “How
Trump could save Palestinian statehood,” and had it published in the Washington
Post. That's where you'll find him say––apparently unaware of what he was
relaying––that the term “peace process,” which has been bandied about for
something like two decades, expresses a “most hackneyed rhetorical theme”.
Well then, if two decades of saying 'peace process' to
express the renewal of hope and the preservation of life, is hackneyed rhetoric
to these people, what do you think saying 'holocaust'––a word that expresses
despair and the gruesome loss of life––means to them? If it does not mean
hackneyed rhetoric, it must mean something worse than that; something as
offensive as death itself.
So we must ask the question: Why is it that the Jewish
leaders never tire of using the 'Holocaust' word? And the answer is simple:
they never tire because to shed tears over the Holocaust means the opportunity
to ask for and collect compensation. In other words, talking about the
Holocaust may cause them to shed fake tears, but collecting compensation
afterward wipes the tears off their faces, and restores their smile.
Okay … this was easy to understand, but why is it that peace
bores these people? The truth is that peace does more than bore them; it raises
the specter of denying the validity of what they consider to be the essence of
their religion. After all, Judaism was born the night that a group of beastly
thugs murdered the babies of Egypt ,
looted the country and ran into the desert, aiming to repeat the performance in
Palestine .
Worse, the Jews say they behaved as they did because they were doing the will
of God. And when you do the will of God, you are so absolutely correct; you do
not even contemplate altering your behavior.
And now, thousands of years later, we find the Jews bogged
down, and having to deal with the same issues that made them pariahs of the
planet, and kept them in their miserable state ever since, and everywhere they
went. In fact, that core issue happens to be the subject that Jackson Diehl is
dealing with in his article. To make it easy for the reader to see what he
means, he put it succinctly as follows: “No, this is not the time to fashion a Mideast peace deal”.
The truth is that he is only the latest pundit to say so. In
fact, the order to that effect came out the boiler room of Israel 's Likud
Party a while ago, and the pundits have been struggling to say the same thing,
each according to his or her stylistic formulation. That is, everyone was
required to come up with an excuse as to why it would be a bad idea to forge a
Mideast peace involving the Jews, now or in the foreseeable future … if ever.
And like the other pundits, Diehl came up with a bunch of
excuses, some of which are so novel; he does not realize he shot himself in the
foot suggesting them. Here is how it happened: After saying that President
Trump will join the chorus of those who will declaim the urgency of settling
the conflict, Diehl listed the reasons why this would be a bad idea. They are
as follows:
“A Palestinian state can't happen now because neither
Netanyahu nor Abbas is willing or able to agree to it. When Obama presented
them with a peace framework, Netanyahu buried it in caveats and conditions,
while Abbas simply refused to respond … Trump's notion to break this impasse
involves using friendly Arab states such as Saudi
Arabia and Egypt ”.
Unaware that he had blown his case, Diehl dismissed the
idea, saying that the two countries have their hands full with domestic issues
at this time, and will not be ready to play their role for a long time to come.
He thus recommended that Trump stop trying to broker a peace deal between the
Palestinians and the Israelis.
He then added there is something that the Trump
Administration can work on. It is this: Because Palestinian kids get shot to
death when they do what kids everywhere do when pushed to the point of extreme
despair, it is impossible to punish their dead corpses more than that. But
because the hunger of Jews to punish is infinite, they want Abbas to
collectively punish the parents of those kids by starving them.
Otherwise, says Diehl, the Jews will have the excuse to
continue raping the Palestinian motherland like the savage and cowardly beasts
they have been for half a century.
But President Trump can dismiss the Likud recommendations
offhand because Jackson Diehl did what no Jew did before. He admitted that
“Netanyahu buried [America 's
peace framework] in caveats and conditions”.