The Weasel and the muscular Dork

As any teacher will tell you, the most difficult case of teen politics to deal with, is the one in which a muscular dimwit becomes smitten by a weasel who manages to control him the way that a trainer controls a circus animal.

The weasel would usually tell the dimwit to go after another student or a teacher or an administrator or a counselor by telling him a story about the day when a brave student he once knew did this or that to someone bad, and everyone admired the brave student. The muscular dimwit, who is hungry to be admired, gets the message and tries to pull a similar stunt on someone, thus gets himself into trouble instead of admired.

Teen politics is what the Judeo-Yiddish culture brought to the United States, and you can see it at work in the American Congress of dimwits. Now you can also see an attempt at playing it at the presidential level. It happened that during the Iran nuclear negotiations, the Jews tried to make America bomb Iran instead of negotiating a compromise. When they were accused of inciting war, they became so indignant, they denied the accusation and in turn, accused the accusers of proposing policies that will lead to war. But they remained quiet during the balance of the Obama Administration, and that was a welcome relief while it lasted.

There has been an election since, and now the Jews believe they have the right kind of muscular dork in the White House; one they feel they can jerk around and get him to bomb Iran. Thus, it has been observed that one by one, members of the Jewish mob of pundits have come out and openly advocated the bombing of Iran, unafraid of being accused of inciting war.

One of those implementing a dirty game, is Benny Avni who is playing the role of weasel. He is trying to goad Donald Trump, who is President of muscular America, into bombing Iran. Avni does that by telling Trump a story about how the much admired “Israel just showed what a 'red line' is really supposed to mean.” And this happens to be the title of an article that Avni wrote and published on September 7, 2017 in the New York Post.

In his preamble of several paragraphs, Benny Avni makes the point that in hitting a Syrian installation – to which Israel does not admit – Israel sent a message to the effect that this kind of “daring attack [is] a method that should be studied carefully and emulated when possible.” Whoa! Whoa! Careful now, my friend, don't ask me to explain how an attack that is not admitted to can be so clear as to be studied and emulated. Let me tell you, this is the kind of Jewish logic I deemed beyond explanation … and I leave it at that. If you want to know more, find a Jew who might explain it to you, if you can find one out there.

Benny Avni is telling the story of one named Amos Yadlin because he wants to send out the message that when America commits international piracy to further the interests of Israel, it does something good. You see, Yadlin is one of those who participated in the bombing of Iraq's civilian nuclear station, he says. But instead of saying this was the act that led to the current mess in the Levant, and to Iran developing its own nuclear capability, he said it was a good thing for “combating proliferation.” This too is Jewish logic that defies ordinary human logic.

Back in the business of forcefully inciting America to bomb Israel's enemies of the day, Benny Avni who is a prominent member of the mob of Jewish pundits, chose to be the one giving the Trump Administration details of its next assignment. He tells it that “the Syrian war appears to be winding up in victory for Assad, Iran and Hezbollah.” He does not explain how this happened despite the billions of dollars that America has given Israel to prevent something like this from happening, but he is lamenting.

Not only is he lamenting that the wrong side is winning, he also admits that Israel's repeated failures over the decades, have led to the “proliferation of banned arms in the process.” And he anticipates “a Syrian-Iranian-Hezbollah response” to Israel's latest attack, which is the Jewish way of telling America it must be ready to rush to Israel's rescue when the latter will get into trouble.

In conclusion, Benny Avni says he has something to tell the “knee-jerk 'no military solution' crowd.” His message is that “daring, well-planned surgical attacks are a non-proliferation tool that should be considered where practical.” He did not explain “should be considered” for what. But he didn't have to because he already pointed out the brilliant victories that the Syrian-Iranian-Hezbollah coalition has accomplished. Isn't that why America gave Israel a quarter of a trillion (with a T) dollars to accomplish!? Was it not to force an arms race and the escalation of the conflict in the region?