The editors of the Washington Post wrote a piece to say that
“Israel 's
leaders are deeply disturbed.” They can say that again, but they should not
have stopped here. They should have added they are themselves just as
disturbed, but with a twist. Whereas the leaders of Israel are disturbed and
ingeniously malicious, the editors of the Washington Post are disturbed and
distressingly foolish.
These characters write for a publication called the
Washington Post. That's Washington in the District of Columbia , located in the United States of America .
It is not occupied Palestine-cum-Israel or even
occupied America
… at least not yet officially. But here they are; editors of the Post treating
America as a subordinate to the Jewish masters who did something big in the
Middle East so as to send a “wake-up call for Trump” that seems unaware the
world is at peril, and he has the duty to do something to save it.
You can read all about this story in the piece that was
written by the editors of the Washington Post under the title: “Israel 's strike in Syria should be a wake-up call for
Trump,” published on September 14, 2017 in the Washington Post, of course.
You'll see in that piece of work how a bunch of outgrown
juvenile editors reveal themselves to be unprepared for the assignment they
undertook. They did a lousy job because they lacked the natural talent, and
because they neglected to gather the information that's necessary to complete
the task at hand in a professional way. Here is a glaring example of a childish
performance that would make a school teacher cringe, reading it in a student's
paper: “Israel
carried out an audacious bombing raid on a Syrian facility.” How backward!
Because terrorist organizations love to use words like
“audacious” when describing operations carried out by those they train, the
Israeli organization – known as the military that's in charge of carrying out
hit and run operations – loves to attribute similar terms to itself. But
because the Jews wish to maintain a state of deniability in case something goes
wrong, they seek American jerks like the editors of the Washington Post to
utter the forbidden words on their behalf. And while this goes on, Israeli
officials “neither confirm nor deny” whatever garbage the jerky surrogates spew
while Israel
reaps the benefit of a propaganda it never pays for.
As demeaning to America
as this may be, it is how the editors of the Washington Post have come to call
“audacious” the non-confirmed rumors about the launch of an American-made air
to ground missile, fired from an American-made warplane that was flying outside
of Syria 's air space, on a
target said to be inside Syria .
This poses an interesting question: Would a terrorist trained by the bin-Laden
organization, call this operation audacious? Maybe a semi-trained teenager
would, but not a fully trained professional commando ready to bring down a twin
tower, for example.
Having described all that background in detail so that
everyone will know who is master and who is subordinate in the Israel-America
relationship, the editors of the Washington Post went on to tell America what it
must learn about “Mr. Netanyahu's point of view.” They say that “the Israeli
leader has spoken against Iran 's
steps toward turning Syria
into a military base,” but nothing was done to prevent this from happening.
The problem, they say, is that “Mr. Trump has been slow to
recognize that the United States
has vital interests in Syria .”
Perhaps, you say to yourself, but then ask: What are these interests? Out of
curiosity, you comb through the article to see if there is anything linking
Syrian affairs to American interests, but find no direct link at all.
What you find, however, is this: “By expanding into Syria , Iran
is escalating the threat to Israel .
Tehran has supplied Syria with an arsenal of up to
150,000 rockets. Adding more missiles to that and opening a new front along the
Golan Heights could spark a direct conflict between Iran
and Israel ”.
For this reason, the editors of the Washington Post want the
Trump administration to take “its own steps to block the Iranian entrenchment
in Syria
that Mr. Netanyahu spoke of.” And they add the standard Jewish staple:
“Diplomacy might achieve some of that, but military steps should not be ruled out”.