Proliferation is not stopped by Escalation

There is something weird about the Jews of Israel apparently committing an international crime, declaring that it will neither confirm nor deny it, and then allowing a thousand members of the mob of Jewish pundits in America to give full details of a crime that cannot be verified.

This is what happened recently yet again, as relayed by the Jewish American pundit Elliott Abrams who wrote an article under the title: “Israel's Bombing of a Weapons Factory in Syria: What Comes Next?” It was published on September 8, 2017 on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations.

What comes out of this piece, if true, is a classic case of escalation in the arms race throughout the Middle East because one side (in this case the Jews) keep convincing America – which supplies Israel with weapons – that if Israel keeps getting deadlier weapons from America, it will be able to checkmate its evil neighbors who will throw their hands up in the air and surrender.

But each time, reality proved to be that the neighbors matched Israel's escalation after each move. The result was that pundits came out and pleaded with America to standby because it might have to rescue Israel yet again. This time, like every time, the excuse is not that the neighbors will attack Israel but that Israel will attack the neighbors in an attempt to checkmate them, but may find itself checkmated instead. And we have other pundits, Elliott Abrams among them, advocating that Washington must allow Israel access to the stockpile of weapons America stores in Israel.

Recall that during the last Israeli criminal assault on Gaza, the Israelis bombed a UN school full of sleeping Palestinian mothers and their children who had taken refuge there, based on information supplied to them by the Israelis who said their homes will be bombed, and that a safe place for them will be the UN school. They went there to spend the night, and were bombed by the Israeli military that told them to seek refuge in that place.

When the full dimension of this barbaric act became known to the world, the Jews revealed that the bombs Israel used on the UN school had come with America's consent from the American stockpile in Israel. This raises questions as to why Elliott Abrams is now suggesting that America declare it will give Israel access to that same stockpile of bombs if and when Israel launches the new crime it says it is itching to commit.

There is only one explanation to that riddle. It is that the Jews intend to use America's declaration as vindication to the claim that America had participated in planning the trick that sent Palestinian mothers and their children to a place where they could be bombed; and that America would do it again. This is a classic example of the Jew counting on the trust that his “friend” has in him, to throw that friend to the wolves so as to save his own skin. Now, my friend, you know why Jews always end up in the oven.

So much for that part. On another level, it's been almost half a century that America has been lavishing the most advanced weapons on Israel under the deluded belief – brought about by a relentless Jewish campaign to brainwash America's elected leaders – that Israel's neighbors can be beaten into submission. When this is done, said the educators, a Jewish nirvana will descend on the Middle East, and America will be recognized as the glorious donor of the magnificent weapons that made it all possible.

Alas, it is now obvious that the Americans are slowly snapping out of that Jewish delusion, and no one knows it better than those who used to administer the brainwashing. In fact, the new Jewish campaign aimed at getting America involved in trying to stop Iran from gaining influence in Syria and Lebanon, has fizzled out due to the growing lack of interest.

And so, we must ask: What else is Elliott Abrams trying to accomplish by writing that article? Well, he seems to have the two old objectives in mind, but he is coming at them from a different angle this time. They are (1) to try and scare Israel's neighbors without invoking the discredited garbage about Israel having a nuclear arsenal; and (2) try to get America involved in the new crime that Israel is engineering.

First, Abrams is telling a long story about Israel warning America in 2007 and 2008 that it will bomb Gaza, and then did it. This is intended to warn Israel's neighbors that contrary to popular belief, Israel keeps its word when it telegraphs in advance it is going to fight. And so, they should be scared.

Second, Abrams went out of his way to remind the Americans they took control of Bab-el-Mandab straight which leads to the Suez Canal as a warning to Iran it will not be permitted to threaten shipping there. He also reminds President Trump that when he was a candidate, he promised that the Iranians “will be shot out of the water” if they misbehave in the Persian Gulf.

Well, then, the Iranians are now misbehaving in Syria, says Elliott Abrams. He wants to hear a similar promise from the President, and wants to see a commitment to it because Iran is spreading its influence at a fast pace in the entire Levant, not just in Syria, he goes on to say.

Given that the original intent, and the promise were to the effect that Israel will stop the proliferation of weapons in the hands of bad actors if America had Israel's back, supplied it with advanced weapons, and allowed no light between them – we must conclude that Israel was the boy that promised to do a man's job but couldn't even do a boy's job. It is time for Donald Trump to tell this boy: You're fired.