Denying the Holocaust is one thing, justifying it is
another. There are a few who deny the Jewish Holocaust inflicted on them by the
Nazis, but no one has justified it. On the other hand, there are many who
continue to deny the Palestinian Holocaust inflicted on them by the Jews, and
there are those who justify it.
Count Matthew R.J. Brodsky as being a justifier of the
Palestinian Holocaust. He so badly wants the world to know his point of view he
wrote an article to make it known. The article came under the title: “The
Media's Palestine Narrative Reads Like Fan Fiction” and the subtitle: “Recent
events in Gaza
demonstrate the growing chasm between reporting and reality.” It was published
on May 25, 2018 in the Weekly Standard.
As indicated by the title and subtitle, the subject matter
of the article concerns a demonstration carried out by the Palestinians of Gaza
on their side of the border to commemorate the Holocaust that was inflicted on
them and all Palestinians in 1948. It is a Holocaust that continues to be
inflicted on those who remain under direct occupation in the West Bank, and
those who are kept under air, land and maritime blockade in Gaza .
It was during the days of demonstrations that snipers of the
Israeli military – who were equipped with high powered American guns and
bullets – shot and killed dozens of Palestinians who did not fire a single
shot; having no firearm to do it with. From where the Jews were camped behind
fences and a neutral zone hundreds of yards wide, the Jews picked the
Palestinians and practiced marksmanship on them as if licensed to kill by the
U.S. State Department which designated the Gaza Palestinians as Hamas
terrorists. Whether or not these people are terrorists, that designation
legitimized the killing of human beings in the eyes of animals calling
themselves Jews, and the eyes of congressional retards who themselves should be
kept in a zoo.
With that designation put out for use by those who thirst
for blood, the Israelis practiced the killing orgy on the people of Gaza knowing that there will also be a Matthew Brodsky and
others in America
who will justify the action and get paid articulating it. In fact, this is what
Brodsky did. He relied on a trick that the Jews refined over the decades and
used on the Americans with great success. It is to point to a small act, call
it a cause and attribute to it an effect. This done, they call the effect a new
cause greater than the previous, and attribute to it a newer and greater effect.
They iterate the reasoning several times, thus create a chain of causes and
effects that lead to the ultimate accusation that someone is planning to Final
Solution the Jews.
Here is how Brodsky sequenced the chain regarding the Gaza event: “The prevailing narrative was that Israelis
were shooting and killing unarmed Palestinian protesters, when in fact there
were a series of riots planned by Hamas as cover while they attempted to breach
the security fence, pour into Israel ,
and kidnap or kill Israelis”.
Here it is; Matthew Brodsky called “fact” what he guessed
was the intent of the Palestinians to breach the fence, pour into Israel , kidnap
Israelis and kill them. Never mind that even if the unarmed Palestinians had
managed to breach the fence, they would have faced a division of tanks and
armored vehicles manned by soldiers who would have killed them on the spot
before the Palestinians had the time to implement the chain described as
pouring into Israel, kidnapping civilians and killing them.
Now my friend, I must do something I dislike doing but must
do because it tells a great deal. It is that something new was revealed to me
as to how and why the persecution of me by the Government of Canada on behalf
of the Canadian Jewish Congress, lasted for several decades despite appeals
launched by Jewish civil libertarians to the Canadian Jewish Congress to end
the madness.
I had learned that the government of Jean Chretien bought
the Jewish narrative about a chain of causes and effects, which began with me
saying that Egypt
was a civilized country, and promising to culminate – according to the Canadian
Jewish Congress – with me growing in stature to become the new Hitler that will
implement the Final Solution. What I learned in addition to this, was that the
Jewish civil libertarians who interceded on my behalf, were not the only ones
to take up my case. Someone else did … and there is a story behind this one.
What happened was that on the occasion of starting a new
session of Parliament, Jean Chretien, the Prime Minister of Canada at the time,
had invited the Queen of England, of Canada
and the Commonwealth – to come to Canada and read the Speech from the
Throne in Parliament. It would have been a great honor for him, for Parliament
and for Canada .
The queen said she would come and read the Speech from the
Throne if he, Jean Chretien, will end his government's persecution of one, Fred
Habachi. And Jean Chretien told Her Majesty to shove it because pleasing the
Canadian Jewish Congress was more important to him than pleasing her.
It is this kind of knowledge, coming to light bit by bit,
that renders me ever more pessimistic that the Jews can be so reformed as to
blend harmoniously with the human race or even coexist with humanity in a
ghetto-nation-state they call Israel .