The job of a lawyer defending a client is to gather the bits
of information that's available about the case and stitch them together in such
a way as to create a reality that almost never resembles what actually happened.
The lawyer's aim is to paint his client as a saint, and paint his opponent as
the devil.
When you take a closer look at what the lawyer has done to
embellish the image of his client, you'll find that he constructed a monument
not of bricks and mortar, but one that’s made of high standards and perfect
models. He makes these qualities so eminent and flawless; the monument they
produce looks like perfection even if the reality it represents, is rotten like
anything you can imagine. Thus, if your job is to debunk what the lawyer has
constructed, this is where you begin to push back against his argument.
David French is a lawyer by profession. He is also a
religious man that's interested in politics and journalism. He wrote an article
in defense of Israel 's
right to slaughter people it has robbed of their properties, has confined to an
open sky prison, and has used American weapons, money and diplomatic backing to
annihilate them.
French's article came under the title: “Israel Has the Right
and Obligation to Defend Its Border with Deadly Force” and the subtitle: “Would
you let people who want to kill you into your home?” It was published on May
15, 2018 in National Review Online.
To make his case, David French brought out what he says is
the history of Hamas. Thus, the best way to debunk the spins he utilized to
make his argument; is to correct his fake Hamas history by exposing its
internal absurdities, and also bring out the true history of the Jews. A
comparison of the two histories can then be made. The following passage is the
foundation upon which David French has built his case:
“Every informed person knows that Hamas has a history of
using human shields, including women and children, to drum up international
sympathy and deceive gullible foreign critics into believing that Israel is using
lethal force against peaceful protestors who merely seek a peaceful resolution
to an intractable conflict. Yet we saw tweets and articles not just from the
anti-Israel Left but also from far more thoughtful observers”.
Do you know what this sounds like, my friend? It sounds like
David French is asking you this set of questions: Who are you going to believe?
Your lying eyes or what I'm telling you? He explains that whether you are a
dumb Leftie or a thoughtful critic like himself, you must not be fooled into
believing that when an Israeli bullet strikes a young Palestinian male (not an
elderly man or a woman or a child) and he drops dead in front of you, it means
that Israel has used lethal force. Don't you believe that for a moment, he
pleads.
But David French does not explain the absurdity of what he
just enunciated. Instead, he leaves it up to us to guess that in his view
'lethal' force does not mean 'deadly' force when applied to a Palestinian male;
it means scoring bull's eye during a session of target practice. It must be
that in the eyes bull-headed David French, Palestinian males are not human
beings but things that can be disposed of to make room for Jews.
And this brings us to the history of the Jews. They went
around the world where they lived in almost every home for a while but were
kicked out of each unceremoniously due to their repugnant behavior. Eventually,
the Jews went to Palestine ,
which is the home of Palestinians, without being invited there. What happened
next can be understood through the principle that David French himself has
invoked. It is this: “The international legal standards are clear. A nation has
the right to protect its integrity, supplemented by an inherent right of
self-defense in the face of a hostile foreign power”.
Thus, a legitimate Palestinian resistance movement called
Fatah (later becoming the Palestinian Authority) was formed to do battle
against the hostile foreign power that was invading Palestine . To defeat the Palestinian
movement, the Jewish invaders – now calling themselves Israelis – did the most
cowardly thing there was to do. They convinced a group of Palestinians they
would do well to fight against Fatah. The group called itself Hamas (Arabic for
Enthusiasm) and accepted training, weapons and financing from the Jews. But
instead of fighting against their Palestinian brethren, they fought against the
Jews of Israel.
Rumors have it that David French was not retained by the
Jews to make the case for them. So, we must ask, why is he doing this for?
There can only be one answer to this question. It is that he is a religious
fanatic.
You see, my friend, the Jews convinced a segment of America 's
fanatic Christians that if the Palestinians are allowed to have a state of their
own, the ancient prophecies will never be fulfilled. But if the idea of a
Palestinian state is made to vanish for good, the ancient prophesies will
quickly be fulfilled.
And here is what the Jews have also drummed into the heads
of the David Frenchs and Mike Huckabees of America :
The fate of America is tied
to that of Israel .
If the Jews are made to share the Land
of Palestine with someone else, America will be
made to share superpower status with someone else. But if Israel becomes the hegemon of the region for
ever, America
will forever remain the only superpower on the planet.
This is why – like Abraham – David French and Mike Huckabee
would take the children of America
to the mountain, and cut their jugular veins to please their Jewish gods.
And this is why the American parents who love their
children, must consider the fanaticism of French and Huckabee to be the
'lethal' and 'deadly' arsenic that the Jews continually inject into the food
for thought they feed to the children of America.