Monday, July 23, 2018

And now that Israel proved to be a little Fart...

Having dragged America into the cesspool of endless Jewish bad advice, the Tel-Aviv/New-York axis of the Pax-Judaica/Pax-Americana global calamity is beginning to look shaky.

This reality has prompted the Bibi of Israel to run to Moscow at every occasion where he begged Vladimir Putin to forgive the Jews for what they did to hurt the interests of the Soviet Union –– and later those of Russia –– in the American Congress of know-nothing nincompoops.

The Jews did it by taking advantage of the state to which the Congress had sunk; brought down by years of degradation imposed by the termite-like activities of the Jewish parasites that invaded it. These parasitic moles covered the place with confusion, pitted the political parties against each other, incited the members to attack one another, and decreed that everybody must love the Jews, always the Jews and no one but the Jews. And so, they turned the superpower into a hollowed-out hulk.

The unforeseen side-effect has been the reduction of Israel itself from the artificial whale-like appearance it had enjoyed for a while, to the minnow-like appearance it always was. Unable to pump hot air back into the Israeli blimp, mamma Michelle Dunne, who adopted Israel as its own child, panicked. Realizing that she can never make Israel look like a giant balloon again, she hit on the idea of making Israel's big neighbor look very small to make Israel look big by comparison.

And so, Michelle Dunne teamed up with Andrew Miller to co-write: “Losing Egypt to Russia Isn't the Real Problem––but Collapse Is,” the title of an article that also came under the subtitle: “Cairo is no long[er] a prize to be won, but a weak state in need of reform.” It was published on July 20, 2018 in The National Interest. Having tried a similar stunt once before, and making the mistake of talking economics, a field in which she is as bad as the Bibi can be when faking intellectual honesty, Michelle Dunne avoided the subject this time.

Instead of economics, she made a sweep of every aspect of statehood that she and her writing sidekick could think of. Having a long list on hand, they attacked Egypt directly on some of those aspects, attacked the country indirectly on other aspects, and pooh-poohed Egypt's ability to be useful to America in everything else. When you put all that together, it sounds as follows:

“We have doubts as to whether the Egyptian military is prepared to switch from Western to Russian patronage. We question whether Egypt is a critical military ally to the United States. But what if the relationship did fall apart? On a practical level, the impact on U.S. interests would be minimal. The Egyptian state is less capable than it was, and its military a poor reflection of the force that did well in 1973. Power in the region has shifted to the Gulf, while other Arab countries have eclipsed Egypt in human development. While Trump believes Egypt is key to Israeli-Palestinian peace, neither Netanyahu nor Abbas is likely to move off avowed redlines at Sisi's request. Egypt will still allow U.S. ships access to the Suez Canal. As to overflight and landing rights to U.S. military aircraft, they are less valuable than before. The danger is that Egypt could sink into obscurity or state failure due to poor governance. Egypt is no longer a strategic prize for the United States. It is a challenge to be managed through coercive diplomacy”.

The two clowns have managed to pack not one message in their article, but two of them. The first is that Egypt has become so small, everyone else in the neighborhood looks big by comparison, including Israel. The second message is that if left alone, Egypt will collapse and create serious problems in the region. For this reason, Miller and Dunne are recommending that America act to fix the situation ... not by handling Egypt with kid gloves but using coercive methods.

Even if someone didn't know that Michelle Dunne made a career weeping the sad song which says: “the end is near for Egypt,” and calling on America to force that country into emulating America's Congress of nincompoops to save it from the collapse that hasn't come in seven thousand years, is there any indication in the article that shows how wrong Dunne and her sidekick are? The answer is yes; and here is the passage that shows it:

“The Egyptian-Russian cooperation needs to be seen in a broader context. Egypt is not seeking to replace the U.S. but rather to supplement it with Russian support. Egypt has sought to return to a more independent foreign policy. Egypt no more wants to be dependent on Russia than it wants to be dependent on the U.S. Moreover, Sisi has sought to expand defense and commercial ties with Germany and France as avidly as with Russia”.

The truth is that the Egyptian economy is firing on all cylinders, scoring a growth rate of between 5.5 and 6 percent, quarter after quarter. Investors from around the world are flocking to Egypt loaded with oodles of money to invest in a country that is fast becoming the economic miracle of the future as far as the eye can see.

Since Michelle Dunne and all those like her –– totally ignorant of economic matters but anxious to detect signs that growth has plateaued in Egypt, if only temporarily –– let me help them. They'll know that growth has plateaued when they see what is called “hot money” come into the country.

That would be money brought in by speculators, not to invest in something productive, but to buy property they hope to flip to another sucker who will pay them a higher price. Dunne and company will know this time has arrived when the government will impose a tax on incoming capital –– Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).