Did you hear the latest? It happened while you were asleep.
The world has changed.
No, that wasn't the Shah of Iran crowning himself emperor
because he could not find someone worthy enough to crown him. This time, it was
his imperial holiness Matthew Continetti sending a memo to his prime minister
Donald Trump of the Federated Empire of America, instructing him as follows: I
have no objection to you meeting with Putin but make no grand bargain. Give me
instead the four No's: no sanctions relief; no recognition of Crimea; no
withdrawal from Syria, and no trusting Putin.
So you ask: Where is the paradigm shift? And the answer is
that control of the universe has shifted – perhaps temporarily or perhaps for
good – from Wolf Blitzer's Situation Room at CNN to Matthew Continetti's
Washington Free Beacon in the District of Columbia. And you can read all about
the said infamous memo in the article that came under the title: “No 'Grand
Bargain' with Putin” and the subtitle: “The risks to American deterrence aren't
worth it.” That piece of work was written by Matthew Continetti, of course, and
reprinted from the Washington Free Beacon in National Review Online on July 14,
2018.
The goal of the self-crowned master of the universe is to ascertain
that America will remain in Syria to stand like a sentinel protecting Israel's
murder of Palestinians and Israel's theft of Palestinian properties. Like the
rest of the mob of Jewish pundits, Continetti came up with all kinds of fake
reasons as to why America must spend trillion more dollars to see more lives of
its own perish in far away lands, sent there by their government to kill
innocent people that did nothing to harm America. Look at the way that little
Matthew formulated these thoughts:
“American withdrawal from Syria would be doubly
self-defeating. Our mission there prevents Assad from reestablishing 'full
control,' deters Turkey and provides us intelligence. Our departure would
remove the heavy boot on ISIS's neck. The lesson in the early 21st century is
that terrorism festers in places where no military has established 'full
control.' It would be the height of folly to create such a place in Syria on
purpose [the way we did in Iraq and Libya]”.
It will take a few more years of growing up before Matthew
Continetti will have learned that the foreign control of a society––originally
known as colonialism; later renamed neocolonialism––plants the seeds of
rebellion, awakens the forces of resistance, creates wars of liberation and the
inevitable invitation to acts of terror. Only then will he realize that the Pax
Judaica disguised as Pax Americana––his elders planted in his head––will fail
to accomplish what he believes “our mission there” will do. What will happen
instead is a rekindling of the conditions that started in the nineteenth
century and culminated in the twentieth century with blaming the Jews for
starting all wars, and the attempt to permanently do away with them to
permanently do away with wars.
Matthew Continetti and all the young who are schooled in the
Ronald Reagan slogan, “peace through strength” and the W. Bush doctrine of
America remaining militarily superior to all the others combined – end up making
fools of themselves when they are not careful how they treat the subject. In
fact, they cannot believe in those concepts without believing in the idea that
to get there, America must be engaging in an arms race. And when you have an
arms race, you do not adhere to an arms control treaty whether or not there is
one.
To be ignorant of these realities and mock someone for not
adhering to arms control, will make the readers laugh alright, but not at the
one being mocked; they’ll laugh at the one doing the mocking. Here is an
example from the Continetti article: “The Russians look at arms control the way
you and I look at dieting and nutrition: as pledges that work to one's
advantage in the short term but are ineluctably broken.” You may laugh at
little Matthew.
Not only has the schooling of the new generation of
right-wing fanatics gone out of control with regard to the subjects that relate
to war and peace, it has gone out of control with regard to the subjects that
relate to the treatment of both friends and foes.
At the very moment that America's “friends” are scratching
their heads wondering if America views them as friends or foes, Continetti says
this: “Russia has no intent to act on its promises of diplomatic comity. It's
almost as if it can't help being the bully in regions it considers important.”
Tell that to Angela Merkel of Germany and Theresa May of the United Kingdom.