An oxymoron is usually made of two or three words.
It might go something like this: “a truthful Jew.” The idea is that if you
happen to believe there are no truthful Jews at all, you'll think of the saying
as being an impossibility. And that's what makes it an oxymoron.
Sometimes, however, it takes more than three words
to express an impossibility; it takes an elaborate concept to do so. Therefore,
a construction of this kind will have to be called an oxymoronic concept. More
than that, the concept itself can at times be expanded to become a full-blown
narrative. In this case, the resulting creation will have to be called an
oxymoronic narration.
As it happens, Clifford D. May came up with a
perfect example showing how a development such as that can unfold to take its
ultimate form, the oxymoronic narration. He wrote: “Criminal regimes against
the rest of us,” which is the seven-word title of his latest column. It was
published on September 18, 2018 in the Washington Times.
The inference here is that there is “us” who are
not criminals, and there are “regimes” out there which are. Well, if you happen
to believe that by “us,” Clifford May is referring to murderous Israel, and to
America its accomplice, you'll have to think of the column's title as being an
oxymoronic concept. This being the case, you must also think of the full column
as being an oxymoronic narration.
Here is why: Clifford May borrows Marshall
McLuhan's idea of modern communication having reduced the world to the size of
a “Global Village.” Clifford May uses this image as the setting in which the
story he narrates is developed, and where the points that he makes are
illustrated. Here is how he expressed all that: “You live in a nice town. One
day thugs, thieves and murderers move into the neighborhood. Do you integrate
them into your village? I suspect your answer is no. So why should it be
different in the global village?”
The answer to that question is no, it should not
be any different in the global village, anymore than he can call the indigenous
Natives of America: “thugs, thieves and murderous,” for having lived peacefully
in their own village for thousands of years. And neither can he call “friendly,
honest, respectful of one another and abiding by the rules” the armed invaders
that came from Europe to murder the Natives and rob them of their land.
As well, what Clifford May can or cannot say with
respect to America's Natives, are concepts that apply equally to the situation
which developed between the Palestinians who did not go to kill Jews in their
European village, but saw the Jews come from Europe to kill them and rob them
of their Palestinian village where they had been living peacefully for
thousands of years.
Clifford May has turned reality upside-down, and
it is this kind of sickly logic that transforms the narratives purveyed by Jews
into impossibilities, thus earn them the label oxymoron. But why is it that the
political elites in the so-called democracies –– more specifically, the English-speaking
democracies –– are incapable of exercising their First Amendment right to free
speech, and tell the Jews (among them Clifford D. May) that they are full of
hooey when they pretend that everything will be fine in the global village if
those whom the Jews incite America to annihilate, were annihilated today rather
than tomorrow?
The answer to that question is so unreal, what
stands behind it can be as unreal as Jewish logic is known to operate in the
upside-down mode. What happens is that the more the public expresses annoyance
at the government for making laws and rules that favor the Jews, the more the
Jews ask the government to tighten the screws on the public, and the more the government
responds positively to the Jewish request.
In so doing, the government causes the public to
get angrier still, which scares the political elites even more. But instead of
diminishing their support for the fake Jewish needs, the elites listen to the
advice of the Jewish leaders who tell them that the upcoming explosion is so
real and so near, they better not abandon the Jews now because if they do and
the explosion comes, they will be fingered as having been on the “wrong side of
history.” They will be tried and convicted or hunted like the Nazi criminals that
escaped justice.