North Korea called America's approach to the
negotiations that were meant to end the state of war on the Korean Peninsula,
an act of gangsterism. Where did that come from? And what does it mean in the
context of the situation that exists in the Far Eastern region, and the rest of
the world?
Well, given that gangs are normally thought to be
an assembly of thugs, gangsterism means to act like a thug. That's how the
North Koreans meant to describe Mike Pompeo’s sayings when he demonstrated that
America's style of negotiating was to tell the North Koreans they must disarm
before he would sit with them and discuss if America was prepared to reciprocate
in any fashion.
That stance evoked the image of a thug pulling a
knife from his pocket, of ordering North Korea to strip itself naked, and of
throwing the clothes at his feet. It is this or he will get violent and do the
kind of damage that North Korea would not want to suffer. This is what the
North Koreans saw and heard, and that's when they responded with a resolute: Go
fly a kite away from us –– you, American gangster. So, what do you think, my
friend? Was this episode not humiliating enough for America?
To understand how America was brought down to this
level, we must recall and examine the role that the Jews have played in
altering the American culture from the dignified level where it stood half a
century ago to the devalued level where it stands today. And the best way to do
that, is to review and parse an example that should help us get a sense of what
the Jews did, and how their doings have transformed America. A good example to
look at is a recent column that was written by Jonathan S. Tobin under the
title: “Trump's Iran sanctions prove the establishment wrong –– again,”
published on September 20, 2018 in the New York Post.
What we find in this article are all the
ingredients we detect in similar articles – all of them written by Jews or
their lackeys. The articles include hatemongering, fearmongering, warmongering,
praising someone while denigrating another, the stirring of partisan hatred,
the pitting of people against people and the making of false promises about
rosy outcomes that never materialize. What follows is a condensed version of
the Jonathan Tobin article:
“When Trump withdrew from the Iran deal, the
foreign-policy establishment was opposed to Trump’s action. They were loyal to
Obama and contemptuous of Trump. They warned that the move will fail because
the Europeans, Russians and Chinese will do business with Iran. And there will
be a hike in oil prices. But they were wrong. Reports say the move has crippled
Iran's oil exports without causing an increase in prices. How is that? Obama
was guided by false assumptions. He thought the way to proceed was to work with
U.S. allies, Russia and China; and that Iran was too strong to be brought to
its knees. But the shift in energy markets means that Iran has little leverage.
The success of sanctions should encourage the U.S. to push Tehran harder, thus
generate respect for Trump's approach to the region”.
As can be seen, Jonathan Tobin began his
discussion by pitting the current administration against the previous, and by
warning that the foreign-policy establishment is still loyal to the previous
administration. He went on to promise that in predicting a rise in the price of
oil if sanctions were imposed against Iran, the establishment will be proven
wrong. Well, guess what. The price of oil has been rising steadily since then,
prompting President Trump to tweet his displeasure at what he was seeing. The
reality is that Brent Crude has now gone above 80 dollars a barrel and WTI
above 70 dollars, which are levels not seen in years. And prices are still
climbing, with no end in sight.
Tobin spoke also of false assumptions that were
made with regard to America's petroleum potentials. He refuted them by
repeating the most horrendous farce that people like himself have perpetrated
on the American public. He mentioned “the shift in energy markets,” which is
supposed to mean that America produces enough petroleum to supply itself and
the world even if everyone else stopped producing oil.
But the fact is that (speaking in round figures)
the world produces and consumes 100 million barrels a day. America consumes 20
million of them but produces only 10 million while importing the balance. That
is, America produces only half what it consumes, and needs the world to help it
fill the gap … not the other way around.