Depending on your point of view, the
United States of America is blessed with or suffering from a slow burning civil
war that has been going on for half a century between a silent majority as
defined by the late President Richard Nixon, and a vocal minority that is
defined by as many oral passageways as a millipede has legs.
Still a majority but on its way to become
a minority, this wing of the American society is made of middle-class blue
collar and white-collar workers. It is increasingly becoming vocal, but doing
things in accordance with the principles of law and order as championed by
Richard Nixon. The rank-and-file try to effectuate the changes they want
through the ballot box, but given that Washington no longer responds to the
people that elect it, blocs of that majority are splitting away from the core,
and forming separate groups that range in temperament from the moderate to
extreme.
In the same way that the British generation
of the 1950s was forced into seeing the reality of the new world order by the
fiasco that resulted from the 1956 attack on Egypt, the American generation of
the new millennium was forced to acknowledge the reality of the new, new world
order by the disastrous involvement of its military in the Middle East. And
just as the British reckoned that they had to retrench from their various
involvements in overseas affairs, the Americans began to think along the same
line.
As to the vocal minority in America, it is
tackling a multitude of issues simultaneously. Such issues pertain to local
matters as well as international ones. Locally, the members of this wing want
to erase the lines that separate people from each other, be they of different
skin color, status, religious affiliation, level of wealth, sexual orientation,
gender or what have you. At the international level, they want to disengage
from all military agreements, and bring the soldiers home. On the other hand,
they want the United States to participate in all kinds of global institutions
as an equal member among the nations of the world.
While these people are united in their
embrace of those principles, they are separated into small groups on most other
issues. It is not that they oppose each other on the issues; it is that each
group sits snugly in its cocoon, feeling protected against the kind of outside
influence which could damage the turf they have constructed for themselves.
Separated from those two wings are the
Jewish organizations. They hover above them like a sorority of vultures, and
watch for the opening of an opportunity to swoop down on them and exploit them.
The Jews have an agenda of their own, which consists of promoting Israel
without restriction or limit, as well as boosting it to become the undisputed
hegemon of the Middle East ... possibly even what lies beyond the region. While
this is their international agenda, the Jews know they cannot implement it
without first taking control of the United States of America. This is why they
have also developed a national agenda.
Two articles will help us understand how
the Jews implement their two agendas. At the international level, there is the
Shelley Neese article that came under the title: “Why the US and Israel Were
Right to Leave UNESCO,” published on January 17, 2019 in Algemeiner. At the
national level, there is the Philip Terzian article that came under the title:
“A misplaced human rights award,” published on January 14, 2019 in The
Washington Times.
Reading the Neese article, you get the
impression that you're hearing a dirty old woman tell a teenager that if he
came with her to the bedroom, she'll show him how the two of them can work
together and accomplish exciting things the world will never know about.
That scene represents the Jews who failed
to conjugate with anyone since the beginning of time. They now believe they
discovered a receptive ear in America without thinking for a moment of the
possibility that before Israel will have become the hegemon of their dream,
their fate in America will have come to resemble what they met everywhere else
in the world. Such fate came about each time that they thought they had
discovered a receptive ear with whom to forge a weird relationship. The trouble
is that they failed to realize then, as they fail to understand now, that the
human species is not used to their kind of weird, if not deviant relationship.
As to the Terzian article, reading it
gives the impression that you're hearing an ex-con that's out on parole, scream
at a police officer for giving a traffic ticket to the driver of a speeding car
instead of arresting him and throwing him in jail.
That scene represents the Jews whose
problem is that they live in the fake world of negative superlatives about
others, and positive superlatives about themselves. The consequence being that
they grow up without developing the sense of proportion which allows normal
human beings to differentiate between what is normal and what is beyond the
pale.
The Jews do things that people tolerate
for a while thinking that they will change at some point. But instead of changing,
the Jews take the silence of others as a sign that what they do is kosher. And
so, they double down, thus force people to become abnormally angry. The result
is that the usually normal human beings begin to act in a manner that’s out of
character; and before you know it, engage in a pogrom or a holocaust.