In the everyday life of the real world, most people
are familiar with the expression: “guilty by association.” It is an accusation
that has the potential to apply in a multitude of instances, which it does some
of the time. But in most cases, this happens when innocent people are viewed
with suspicion because they worked in a place where someone turned out to be a
notorious crook.
Separate and apart from that, the Jewish propaganda machine
made it a specialty to create links between disparate events, however tenuous
they may be, and call for action where none would be warranted under normal
circumstances. The most infamous case being the time when the Jews took
advantage of the lightest weight to ever occupy the White House, and convinced
him that moral clarity was to think of those who committed 9/11 in New York and
ran to hide in Afghanistan, and equate them with a Palestinian mother that was
seen holding a toddler in one arm, and throwing a stone at an Israeli tank that
was demolishing their house.
Thus, the fake association of a serious act of
aggression that resulted in the death of thousands ... with a meager act of
self-defense that resulted in no damage at all, was used to legitimize the
Jewish genocidal acts of strengthening the occupation of Palestine, calling
such acts legitimate exercises of a sovereign state. In addition, all acts of
resistance committed by Palestinians against the military occupation of their
country, became acts of terrorism in the eyes of the Americans who populate the
Washington Beltway.
Buoyed by that kind of success, the operators of the
Jewish Propaganda machine saw an opportunity to apply the old principle of
doing to America what America allows them to do to others. And so, they brought
to America the principle of making tenuous associations where it works for
them, and then make demands. One such demand being the need to learn history to
avoid repeating it. To that end, the Jews want to impose on America's children
the compulsory memorizing of Holocaust stories.
It was inevitable that playing the game of fake
associations, gave the Jews the idea of upgrading the game to now fabricate
fake associations for a different reason; that of breaking-up existing legitimate
associations. That is, if the association between A and B looked like a
marriage made in heaven but beyond the control of Jews, they would want to
break it up. The way they do it, is to accuse B of associating with C who is
evil, and then demand that A break ties with B.
Given that the Jews maintain a long list of people in
the C category, they never stop trying to break up associations between
Americans and foreigners, and between Americans and Americans. They manage to
score a number of successes in this area on a regular basis, where some of the
cases are easy to break and some are a little harder to break. But there is one
case that turned out to be an impossible nut for them to crack.
You can familiarize yourself with it by reading an
article that came under the title: “Democrats Should Police Hate on Their Side
of the Aisle, too,” written by Jonathan S. Tobin, and published on January 21,
2019 in National Review Online. For decades, their boogeyman had been the
reverend Louis Farrakhan, an African American leader they spent much effort
trying to isolate him from his followers, but failing to do so.
Not only that; they finally got it through their thick
skulls that the more they try to malign Farrakhan, the more they make him look
good in the eyes of the public. And so, while reciting the same old talking
points, Jonathan Tobin chose not mention the name Farrakhan in his latest
article.
Instead, Tobin employed a new trick. It is to equate
two sets of associations, and go from there. On the one hand, there is the
association that used to exist between the Republican Party and Steve King. On
the other hand, there is the association that continues to exist between the
Democratic Party and both Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.
The Jews are saying that because the Republican Party
disciplined Steve King when he made White supremacist remarks, so should the
Democratic Party discipline Omar and Tlaib for complaining about the Jewish
habit of shamelessly displaying a supremacist tendency, which the Jews do with
words and with deeds they commission others to execute on their behalf.
What Tobin has not said is that no Black person has
ever owned a White slave, and no Palestinian has ever occupied the property of
a Jew anywhere on the planet where the Jews chose to live now or ever.
Until Tobin proves that such has happened, every
American of African descent such as Ilhan Omar will have the right to complain
about the supremacist attitude of Whites.