Suppose you are a bona fide member of a club that comprises all
kinds of people. You know some of them closely, some of them barely, and
everyone else between closely and barely. Generally speaking, you mind your own
business, except that you're witnessing a spectacle that's been unsettling you
for some time now. And you wonder if you should keep quiet or bud-in and have
your say.
The above is meant to serve as the basis for a metaphor reflecting
the club of nations that make up all of humanity. Each individual that’s alive
today, knows some of those nations closely, some of them barely, and everyone
else between closely and barely. You are one such individual, and you feel
unsettled whenever you see a Jew urge America to do the things you know will
provoke what he says he's trying to avoid. What do you do?
Clifford D. May is a Jew that never stops telling America what to
do, and was never proven to have given a good advice. If you want to know why he
is always off the mark, you'll find the answer in his latest column. You'll
discover that he begins every intellectual journey with a false premise,
incapable of seeing things the way they are. Instead, his mind's eye is
permanently fixated on a painting that was inculcated in him as a child; one
that bears no resemblance to the real world. And Clifford May passes the same
judgment on the same things no matter how much they change in real life.
His latest column came under the title: “The first two years of
Trump,” published on January 1, 2019 in The Washington Times. Even though the
stated purpose of the article is to review what President Donald Trump has done
or failed to do in the two years he has occupied the Oval Office so far, you'll
find that the article says more about Clifford May's worldview than that of
Donald Trump.
The first thing that strikes you, is that Clifford May sees the
world as being made of “enemies, adversaries and competitors,” all of them
trying to make further advances in the world at a time when Donald Trump has
decided to “withdraw 2,000 troops from the battlefield in Syria ... and pull
half the 14,000 troops out of Afghanistan”.
Even though Clifford May has described Trump as being “mercurial,
impulsive and too quick to cast modest progress as significant victories,” he
took solace in Lindsey Graham's revelation that the President may be having
second thoughts with regard to his Syria decision. And so, Clifford May
expressed his delight by blaring the following six words: “Second thoughts can
be productive thoughts”.
May has praised the National Security Strategy (NSS) document,
recently delivered by Donald Trump, and proceeded to describe what he sees in
it. In his view, the NSS recognizes Iran and North Korea as being rogue
regimes. Recognizes Russia and China as being revisionist powers that “aim to
shape a world antithetical to US values and interests.” And recognizes the
reality that non-state jihadi groups can also pose a threat.
So then, how to fix a world that is plagued by so many challenges?
Well, Clifford May, who is founder of the outfit he calls Foundation for the
Defense of Democracies, wrote the following:
“A recent report prepared by the Foundation for Defense of
Democracies estimates that Beijing is responsible for 50 percent to 80 percent
of cross-border intellectual property theft worldwide, and more than 90 percent
of cyber-enabled economic espionage in the United States”.
When you add this to what came in Donald Trump's National Security
Strategy, Clifford May sees no alternative but to do the following:
“A long and low-intensity conflict utilizing all instruments of
American power is not a pleasant prospect. But if we continue to let our
enemies strengthen, eventually we will face a stark choice: A high-intensity
conflict — with nuclear weapons targeting Americans — or allowing
authoritarians to dominate a transformed world order”.
Do you know what this sounds like, my friend? Do you remember the
old saying: All roads lead to Rome? Well, in this case: All manner of living
with other human beings lead the Jews to the creation of low-level conflicts
that boil over eventually and explode into high-level conflicts in which the
world gets a bloody nose, and the Jews get close to being annihilated.
And so, I ask you again: If you are a bona fide member of a club
that comprises all kinds of people, and you feel unsettled when seeing a Jew
urge America to do the things you know will provoke what he says he's trying to
avoid. What do you do?