The
better something is, the worse will be the process of its decay. This is true
of natural organic matter as it is of the institutions we build to help us
manage the complexities of the civilization we created.
Democracy
is one institution that's turning into a serious problem. It was good while it
remained healthy, but it started to decay. It is thus creating signs of what
promises to be a horror show like humanity has never seen before. The question
we face at this time is this: How can we avoid a fate worse than the two World
Wars we endured at great cost to our human development during the Twentieth
Century?
To
answer that question, we need to understand what it is we're up against. So we
begin with an article that came under the title: “Americans are Tired of Middle
Eastern Mayhem,” and the subtitle: “Can Washington avoid spending another
decade of being entrapped in the Middle Eastern quicksand? Or is it dangerously
close to repeating the same poor judgment?” It was written by Daniel R.
DePetris, and published on January 17, 2019 in The National Interest. Here are
the relevant passages in that article:
“Words
don't tell if the US has learned the lesson to avoid another decade of
entrapment in the Mideastern quicksand. Washington is close to repeating the
same poor judgment. For an explanation as to the region's turmoil, look to the
governments of the region. Iran is one government contributing to the region's
violence. So are Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria, the Taliban in
Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia's boycott of Qatar and campaign in Yemen. The
sectarianism that bubbled after the US invasion of Iraq plagues the region. The
deployment of US troops, trillions of wasted dollars and missions with no
end-game, are evidence that the underlying assumptions were counterproductive.
The American people think so. The message to Arab leaders is this: The US will
continue to be in the region to ensure that its interests are defended. They
are: protect the homeland, prevent a hegemonic power from dominating the
region's politics, and keep oil markets stable for the American consumer”.
What's
wrong with this? A single word answers that question: Israel. Not once in the
explanation offered by the writer, were the names of Israel or the Jewish lobby
in America that's promoting it, mentioned. This is the kind of self-deception
that has kept the Middle Eastern tragedy going, and kept it escalating among
the various jurisdictions, decade after decade. And you don't have to go too
far to ascertain this reality. Just go over the dozens of articles that were
written on the subject of America pulling out of Syria, and you'll be convinced
that Israel and the Jewish lobby are alone responsible for the horror show that
the Middle East has become. Here are 5 articles you might want to consult:
“Trump's
losing Syria. Will he lose the whole region too,” a column written by Richard
Cohen and published on January 14, 2019 in The Washington Post.
“Middle
East Chaos Will Escalate Following the Departure of the Americans,” an article
that also came under the subtitle: “If America departs from the Middle East,
then the region will become a free-for-all for others,” written by Tanya
Goudsouzian and published on January 17, 2019 in The National Interest.
“Trump's
Middle East Strategy and the Kurds,” an article that also came under the
subtitle: “There's a problem with getting too close to Turkey,” written by
Myron Magnet and published on January 17, 2019 in National Review Online.
“The
New Battle Over Donald Trump's Foreign Policy,” an article that also came under
the subtitle: “National Security adviser John Bolton is increasingly isolated,
but the president can ill afford to bleed allies. Rand Paul wants to see
through the president's prerogatives,” written by Curtis Mills and published on
January 18, 2019 in The National Interest.
“Is
Chechnya Putin's blueprint for Syria?” an article that was written by Anna
Borshchevskaya, and published on January 17, 2019 in The Hill.
What you'll encounter
in the 5 articles are Jewish lamentations of this kind: With America departing,
we'll lose Syria if not the whole region. We're losing the Kurds who are
joining Assad to avoid being crushed by the hated Turks. This is why John
Bolton is going bananas … most likely because he foresees that Syria will fall
into Putin's lap who will treat it like he does Chechnya.
And that's the larger
part of the discussion which Daniel DePetris has failed to expose. This is due
to a democracy that has decayed so badly, it created a kind of Jewish-only
political correctness that causes everyone to censor the self.
The act of constantly
attributing positive superlatives to Jews, and negative superlatives to those
who refuse to bow to them, has created a system of self-deceit that made the
devilish Jews look like capable paragons of righteousness; and made everyone
else look like helpless wicked sinners.
And so, to borrow
from the language of economics which says: “If you don't do it, the market will
do it for you,” we can say that if pundits continue to shy away from discussing
the Jewish shortcomings openly and honestly, the street mobs of the future will
handle the matter their own unpleasant way.