What's the difference between Alexander, James and John on the one
hand, and Eliot on the other?
Well, the first three are Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John
Jay. They had a debate among themselves in the 18th century, during which time
they produced 85 essays at the rate of one every two or three days. The essays
were bound together and given the title “Federalist Papers.” They became the
basis upon which the American Constitution was written. As to Eliot, he is
Eliot Engel, a latter-day member of the House of Representatives, and he
happens to be a Jew.
That's not the only difference between the two. The first group,
believes that human beings are endowed with the power of reason and the gift of
speech. When differences of opinion arise among them, the three counsel by
their example, that human beings should get into a debate and try to convince
each other of one's own point of view. In fact, this is how the three authors
contributed to the production of the Federalist Papers.
As to Eliot Engel, he seems to believe that the way to convince
someone of one's point of view, is to go about it the way that animals do. That
is, he would urge you to try convincing others of how you feel by growling and
gesturing, thus generating coercion and producing fear in your opponent. Eliot
Engel wants you to do things the way that animals do, employing neither reason
nor well-articulated speeches.
In addition to hundreds of other articles, you can see this trend
in the article that was written by the staff of the New York Post, and in the
column that was written by Elder of Ziyon, published on the Jewish website,
Algemeiner. The piece in the Post came under the title: “Eliot Engel rips Ilhan
Omar for 'vile anti-Semitic slur,'” published on March 2, 2019. As to the Ziyon column, it came under the
title: “Like Trump, Ilhan Omar Uses Her Platform to Spread Hate,” published on
March 4, 2019.
The Jews who immigrated into America in large numbers before the
Arabs or the Muslims, met with little or no push-back for their weird behavior,
from the Europeans that had been in America long before the advent of the Jews.
The Europeans “turned the other cheek” because the Jews could easily intimidate
them; they whose treatment of Jews in Europe through the centuries, had been
brutal. In fact, the Jews found it easy to use the coercive accusation of
antisemitism as a weapon to silence anyone that opposed them.
Having sharpened their training in the use of that weapon, and
having worked their way into the strategic positions in government and the
media throughout North America, the Jews were able to mow us, Arab writers, as
we trickled into the continent one at a time. Saying something as innocuous as,
“don't believe the negative propaganda about us, we're actually civilized,” was
like walking into a field surrounded by a thousand sharpshooters, each equipped
with a high-speed machine gun, pumping millions of bullets into you for daring
to exercise the right to free speech. We didn't have a chance, and many of us
moved on to making a living in professions that did not stir the Jewish
paranoia.
As our numbers grew in North America with the passage of time, the
survivors among us were able to dull the edge of the Jewish weapon just enough
to allow for a new crop of Arab and Muslim newcomers (born here or immigrants)
to work their way into the system and challenge the supreme positions that the
Jews had secured for themselves.
Despite the fact that we are the authentic Semites whereas the
Jews are pretenders, they uncrated the accusation of antisemitism, and used it
against us to legitimize, even institutionalize the use of the animal method of
coercion and intimidation to settle scores, rather than use the human method of
open debate as suggested by Hamilton, Madison and Jay.
That is, instead of playing the game of democracy by countering
every point with a counterargument, every argument with a differing opinion and
every premise with a push-back, the Jews did the equivalent of responding to
the opposition — Arab or otherwise — by going behind them to a higher
authority, and plunging a knife in the back of those who sought to engage the
Jews in a serious debate.
The Jews did this by kneecapping the opposition's ability to reach
out to an audience, by mugging into silence anyone that dared to point out the
lies they were spreading, and by shooting dead every attempt to unveil and
parse the non-Jewish side of the relevant issues.
The Jews did it to avoid getting into a debate with the Arabs
and/or the Muslims who might expose them as the emperor that has no clothes.