Suzanne Fields wrote a column that
describes the effect of a phenomenon, but says precious little that makes sense
about the cause that brought about that effect in the first place.
The writer used a series of subtle and
circuitous arguments to blame the effect of anti-Semitism on Ilhan Omar and
also Shakespeare who may never have met a Jew, she says. This made it possible
for her to also blame the phenomenon on the people who started the stereotype
that influenced Shakespeare to write The Merchant of Venice, a stage play she
hints is driven by strong anti-Semitic undertones.
You'll find all of this and more in the
column that Suzanne Fields wrote under the title: “When anti-Semitism is reduced
to bitter farce,” published on March 13, 2019 in The Washington Times.
Fields paid particular attention to Omar's
recalling of the “Benjamins,” which is a rap song that offends the Jews
because, as she says, it is “clearly a Jew-bating slur suggesting that American
support for Israel is about big-money donors and lobbyists rather than
grass-roots support.” Well, I have news for Suzanne Fields, and it isn't
something that will cheer her. Despite the multi-decade disinformation tsunami
that has been flooding America, the donors and lobbyists who give, as well as
the politicians who take, know that American grass-roots support for Israel
does not exceed 2 percent of the population. Period.
This is why no business that concerns
Israeli matters is conducted in a public debate in any of the American
legislatures. Under the table agreements between the givers and the takers are
reached by the typical method of Jewish whisper, behind closed doors and in the
middle of the night. When the sun rises, the treasonous conspirators go into
the well of the House of Representatives and the well of the Senate, and vote
“unanimously” without a debate, to give the American store to the Jews of
Israel. And the takers go home and wait for the rewarding kickback to come to them.
After pumping her obligatory contribution
of hot air into the bubble that says the American public loves Israel, Suzanne
Fields turned herself into a demolition squad. She did so, driven by the
misguided reverie that she was constructing a solid case for helping the Jewish
organizations withstand the winds of political change now blowing in America.
Her aim was to reestablish the Jewish control over what happens in that
country. But she blew it big time. What follows is a condensed version of how she
did that:
“Unless Ilhan Omar miscalculated, she will
keep her seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. The Democratic leadership
is terrified of angering her and her followers. The Democrats should revisit
the regrets of the Sulzbergers, owners of the New York Times, who were shamed
after the war for downplaying stories of atrocities against Jews in the run-up
to World War II, lest their paper be identified as Jewish. The Democrats may
come to regret their cowardice in treating anti-Semitism the same as a long
list of other maligned groups, ranging from African-Americans to Pacific
Islanders”.
You can see in that passage how and where
the writer fired three bullets that missed their targets, and went on to
demolish her case. First, she made clear she wishes Ilhan Omar will be removed
from the House Foreign Affairs Committee, an affirmation of the Jewish penchant
for autocratic rule. Second, she revealed her foolish belief that Jews own the
Democratic Party the way that the Sulzbergers own the New York Times. Third,
she expressed the Jewish annoyance that America still refuses to consider the
Jews as being apart, separate and above everyone else in America and the world.
If you, dear reader, still wonder why the
Jews do not get into a public debate with others, here is the answer for you.
They make fools of themselves with every word that comes out their mouths, and
every word they type on their computer keyboards. This article demonstrates
such reality, and there are nearly three thousand other articles on this
website that reveal this truth about the Jews.
But why is it that after being unmasked as
intellectual frauds, the Jews continue to make desperate attempts at convincing
the world they have a case that should be considered seriously, and responded
to favorably? The answer to this question is simple, and known to the American
public better than anything. It is that money makes the world go round, and
nothing likes to go round more than the world of politics.
But knowing that they do nothing to
produce wealth, the Jews realize that any money they accumulate is not really
their money. Thus, when they give some of it to America's politicians in
exchange for say, a Jerusalem that does not belong to the Americans either, the
Jews feel they have created a diplomatic farce that will forever associate
America with a Medieval mentality.
And given the Jewish propensity for
attributing to others what they see in themselves, you'll understand why
Suzanne Fields chose the title that she did for her column: Antisemitism
reduced to a bitter farce.