You got to hand it to Ms. Ilhan Omar.
After half a century of futile attempts to get the Jews to engage in a fruitful
debate about their cowardly habit of throwing the anti-Semitic accusation at
everyone that refuses to bow to them, Ilhan Omar has forced the primitive
savages to admit they had been talking bull. And believe me, half a century of
that stuff was beginning to stink like hell. The world owes Ilhan Omar a big
thank you for moving the immovable object.
Now, dear reader, if you’ll decide to
spend time observing and studying what promises to be the gradual dissolution
of a lie that took half a century to construct — doing so at the expense of
thousands of ruined lives that did nothing to deserve it — you’ll have to begin
by reading: “The Anti-Semitism Virus,” an article that also came under the
subtitle: “On the Left, it is spreading once again.” It was written by Douglas Murray,
and published on March 21, 2019 in National Review Online.
You'll go through 2400 words of
nothingness, crowned by one revealing sentence; this one: “Anti-Semitism can
never be fully explained for the same reason it cannot ever be fully defeated.”
In other words, Douglas Murray is admitting that a Jewish hoax was responsible
for the ruin of thousands of innocent lives. It was the accusation of
anti-Semitism, which is a “trope” as empty as telling someone to drop dead. But
the trope was given the gravity of a murder charge, and used both as a tool to
advance the goals of a hidden Jewish agenda; and a weapon to vanquish any
opposition to that agenda. In fact, trying to make sense of the hoax is what
the Douglas Murray article is about.
Now that the writer has admitted he is
dealing with nothingness, what else was there for him to say in 2400 words?
Good question. What Murray has done, in fact, is pile up a whole bunch of
nothingnesses, devoting space to each, and explaining them in concordance with
the talking points usually put out by the Jewish propaganda machine. You get a
sense of what all of that sounds like from this passage:
“Anti-Semitism is a shape-shifter. It is a
virus that endlessly mutates, taking advantage of environment, locale, host,
events, and more. To survey the number of its ostensible causes is to survey
accusations that themselves encompass everything … At times, Jews were hated
for their religion or their race. In our time they are attacked for their state
[Israel]”.
Even if you didn't know that the Jewish
habit was to look in the mirror and accuse others of what they see in
themselves, you will instinctively want to ask these questions: Who is the
shape-shifting virus? Is it anti-Semitism, like says Murray? Or is it the
Jewish character that begets repugnance, a normal human response the Jews call
anti-Semitism? Searching for answers, we take a quick look at the relevant
history.
It was near the end of the nineteenth
century that the Jewish council of elders realized it had become difficult for
Jews to live with Europeans that were beginning to view the Jews as repugnant
characters. And so, the Jewish elders decided they must have a place of their
own. The Nineteenth century being imbued with the sense of colonialism, the
Jews and their supporters — mostly in Britain — thought of creating a homeland
for the Jews in Uganda, a country situated in the part of Africa where
colonization was in full swing.
But then, it happened that the Ottoman
Empire began to disintegrate, and the Levant was fast becoming a new prospect
for colonization. This is when the talk of creating a homeland for the Jews
shifted from Uganda to Palestine. With that, came something else: the religious
argument that was cheering the idea of Jews going back to their ancestral home.
It was a principle that gave impetus to the nascent Zionist project.
When the illegal migration of Jews into
Palestine began in earnest in the early years of the twentieth century, the
goal was for the Jews to acquire as much land as possible. By 1948, they had
acquired a small piece of Palestine that the United Nations recognized as
Israeli. To this day, this is all that the Jews are legally entitled to. But
the Jews continued to steal more land, aided by the colonial powers that were
not happy seeing their empires shrink. And so, the idea of the Jews being
motivated to settle in Palestine by religious fervor shifted back to that of
Jews being motivated by colonial greed.
Two things happened in 1967 that saw the
Jewish rhetoric go all over the map. First, having captured the West Bank of the
Jordan, the Jewish appetite to expand, shifted to that of ethnic cleansing the
land of its indigenous Palestinian population, and the Jews started to talk
about a project they called the 'situation.' It involved having America play a
major role in starving the Palestinians to force them to flee the land and
leave behind everything they own for the Jews to make their own. This made
America not only an accomplice in the ongoing crime against humanity, but the
main culprit.
Second, having scored a military victory
billed as amazing by the spin doctors of the time, it became easy for the Fifth
Columnists in America to convince the ruling class to take Israel under its
wing. It is how the financial and military establishments of the superpower
were put at the disposal of Israel's Jews. The move gave the latter the
confidence to think in terms of conducting operations beyond Israel's immediate
neighbors, which is how Iran got sucked into the vortex of what used to be a
strictly Levant concern.
All in all, the world has progressed
normally as it did since the beginning of time. Concurrent with that, however,
the Jews have wandered all over the moral landscape, a performance that matches
their wandering habit all over the geographical landscape of the planet. Like
shape-shifting viruses, they went after the opportunities where they saw them.
When done with one place, they shifted their attention to other places in
search of new opportunities to exploit.
Being the one common element in all these
shifts, the Jewish character proved to be the virus that mutates to adapt to
local conditions.