There was a time –– during the period that extended from the late
1960s to the early 1970s –– when homicides were committed regularly on Saturday
night in the New York/Washington area. Those who committed them preferred to
use the gun of a model that came to be nicknamed: Saturday Night Special.
Someone –– I can't remember who –– argued that these homicides
were so senseless, it could only be that those who committed them were missing
something in their lives, thus suffered from a void that needed to be filled.
To fill it, the perpetrators who were mostly young men, went out on Saturday
night and killed someone to feel a sense of accomplishment, thus filled the
void in their lives and appeased their pain.
Soon, a debate erupted about those who felt castrated by a society
that alienated them by ignoring the demands which they tried to articulate but
could not, due to their lack of communication skills. And so, it was argued
that the gun in the hand of these young men became the phallic symbol that made
them feel like giants capable of achieving something as significant as taking
someone's life.
Not long after that, a civil war erupted in Somalia, and a scene
that kept repeating itself in broad daylight over there, lent credence to what
was happening in America on Saturday nights. It was the image of young men
riding jeeps with one of them manning a long gun that protruded into the air
like an erect phallus. They drove around looking for a worthy target to rip
apart like a sex predator would rape a helpless victim.
Eventually, the situation in Somalia changed into something else,
so did the situation in America. The Saturday night lone wolves disappeared
from the streets, but the society that created them in the 1960s and 1970s did
not change or disappear. It spawned a mob of another kind; one that sits at a
computer keyboard and works on asserting its sexual prowess in a dubious
manner.
When you read the works of these (mostly) young men and (sometimes)
young women, you get the impression that as journalists, they no longer want to
function like the eyes and ears of society, watching what those who govern the
nation do, and reporting to the public that elected them. What the journalists
prefer to do in this age of social media that castrated them, is use the little
information they can gather, decide what needs to be done to make the world a
better place, formulate a personal agenda, and whip the elected
representatives, in an effort to force them realize that personal agenda.
A few of the pundits go further and turn their attention to
foreign policy. In a move known as weaponizing an issue, they use human rights
like the protruding gun of the Somali youngsters, which they mount on America's
State Department, even America's military, and pressure both the Congress and
the Commander-in-chief to take their advice and forcefully implement its
content somewhere abroad in fulfillment of their personal agenda.
What these people do not realize is that they have been
brainwashed into believing that what they do is fulfill their personal agenda
when in reality it is the agenda of the Judeo-Israeli lobby that programmed
them to work on pitting America against the nations which are of interest to
Israel. You see an example of this in the article that came under the title:
“United Nations human rights probe of the US is a farce,” written by Zachary
Faria, and published on June 17, 2020 in The Washington Examiner.
Here is how Faria started his presentation of the subject he chose
to discuss: “The United Nations Human Rights Council is holding a debate on
police brutality and systemic racism. It is clear the US is the primary subject
as the killing of George Floyd was the catalyst for the meeting. And it's clear
that the conclusion the council will reach is a sham”.
Because there has not been many instances (if any) during which
the United States Human Rights record was discussed by the UN Human Rights
Council, the fact that Faria called a sham the conclusion that was not reach
for a debate that was not held, tells that Zachary Faria had been thoroughly
brainwashed before he sat to write the article. Moreover, because it is Israel
that's usually reprimanded by the UN Human Rights Council for its continued mistreatment
of the Palestinians, Faria is showing signs of a psychotic delusion which makes
him believe that America and Israel are one and the same entity.
Faria then complained about the demonization of Israel, and backed
his claim by spewing the usual Jewish talking points. To end his discussion, he
said this: “Between the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health
Organization's debacle over the coronavirus and China, it's time for Americans
to start considering real alternatives to the UN”.