Look at this headline: “The International Criminal
Court Goes Too far,” and think about it. Did the Court ask its member states to
create an army that can go anywhere in the world and arrest those whom it
convicts? That would be going too far if it happened during this century, but
maybe not in a future century.
Still, however, this did not happen. So then, what did
the International Criminal Court (ICC) say or do that prompted the online
magazine, National Review, to publish an article written by Jimmy Quinn under
that puzzling headline and post it as it did on June 12, 2020?
You comb through the article looking for an answer,
but all you unearth is that the Court only began the process of establishing
the legal right to investigate possible war crimes committed by America in
Afghanistan, and possible war crimes committed by Israel in the Palestinian
district of Gaza.
This being the first step in a legal procedure, how
can it be described as, “Going too far”? Well, it can be so described if the
subject being investigated is above investigation, which means above the law.
However, since no human being can be above the law, the subject that's doing
the protesting must consider himself or herself a god. This being a whole new
ball game, it gives everyone else the right to counter that sort of logic by
calling the subject a demon and treating them as such.
In consequence of all this, when discussing the antics
of the Americans in relation to the legal obligations of the United States, or
the antics of the Jews in relation to the legal obligations of Israel, the
nature of these entities comes into question. Are they the gods they believe
they are, and we should not question what they do? Are they the human beings we
like to think they are, therefore insist that they pay for their mistakes? Or
are they the demons their excessive behavior would indicate they may be, and we
should treat them harsher than we treat members of our own species?
The ICC may or may not have the evidence to prove the
guilt of America's soldiers or those of Israel in a trial that will proceed
according to the rules of evidence and proper decorum. If after the trial the
verdict comes down as not guilty, it will be good for the soldiers and their
country. But if the verdict is guilty, the soldiers must be punished because
they are human beings and not gods or demons.
However, whereas this part of the legal process is
constrained to establish the truth or inaccuracy of the allegations that have
led to the trial, other parts of the process, such as discovery and
cross-examination, will shed light on the behind-the-scenes machinations that
were mounted by the Jews to silence everyone around the world. What will come
as a bonus to mankind is the elucidation of the method employed by the Jews to
impose dictatorial secrecy combined with the total absence of democratic
debate, in their quest to dominate such weak regimes as America’s.
One of the tricks they pulled is the concoction of a
new definition for the term anti-Semitism. It has the potential to ruin many
innocent lives in many places around the world. Nobody knows how exactly the
definition was engendered, but from the looks and sounds of it, a handful of
crackpots must have come together in a basement where they freebased for half a
day and produced a demonic definition they are gradually imposing on mankind by
meeting with legislators secretly, and having them adopt the definition without
public debate or even the customary in-party deliberations.
This subject is sure to come up during examination at
an ICC trial when a soldier, in a typically Jewish contortion of logic, will
try to explain that as a Caucasian who converted to Judaism, his ethnicity
instantly metamorphosed from a foreigner to a Semitic Hebrew. This made him
indigenous to the land of Palestine and a first cousin of the Semitic
Palestinian people he has been murdering. Thus, the murders must be considered
a case of local police brutality and not a war crime. And this puts the case
outside the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, according to the
Jew and his international “dream” team of lawyers.
This is insane, of course, and no one sane will buy
it. But when the insanity will have been exposed, it will become difficult if
not impossible for someone like Ivanka Trump to put Americans, Brits, Canadians
or Australians in jail just because she felt uncomfortable hearing someone ask
for a “birther” certificate that will prove she was born first cousin of the
Palestinians.
This is important to think about because the rumors
swirling around this matter, have it that Ivanka Trump converted to Judaism to
punish her father whom she saw as the wife-abuser that made life miserable for
her mother before they divorced, and he rushed to marry a woman young enough to
be Ivanka's sister.