If someone is so conditioned since birth to live in
the Stone Age or Medieval Time, he can go through modern schooling, learn all
about contemporary philosophy and ethics, and yet still grow up carrying the
Stone Age or Medieval Time in his heart and his head.
A perfect example of that is Stephen M. Flatow, a
Jewish lawyer who sent his daughter into the war zone of Gaza at a time when
armed Jewish thugs were settled in the strip. She got caught in the crossfire
between these beasts and the freedom fighters who kicked them out of Gaza
eventually. The girl's death gave her father the opportunity to go around and
cry excitedly: Gimme compensation, gimme compensation.
His argument was that, war zone or not, his
twenty-year-old daughter was an innocent victim, innocently sent by him to
innocently enjoy a sightseeing tour of the Gaza Strip, when she was killed by
the indigenous fighters who should not have been where she was traveling.
Even if all the claims of innocence were real, the
death of the girl must be blamed on the father who sent her into a war zone, on
the leaders of so-called Israel who arranged for tours to take place in a war
zone, and on the settlers who brought a reign of terror to a land that was a
model of tranquility since biblical times till the Jews got in there and
brought hell with them. The truth is that this whole episode was anything but
innocent.
You'll know why innocence was absent during that
undertaking when you read the article that came under the Title: “EU hypocrites
take territory while blasting Israeli annexation,” and the subtitle: “France,
the Grand Annexer, lectures Israel? How do you say Chutzpah in French?” The
article was written by none other than Stephen M. Flatow, and published on June
8, 2020 in the Jewish News Syndicate.
That is where, as indicated in the title of his
article, Stephen Flatow reveals his ambition for the armed Jewish robbery of
Palestine. This proves that sending his daughter to Gaza was an integral part
of the Jewish war effort to conquer that land, an act recognized by everyone
sane as a crime against humanity. It is what Flatow tries to justify in the
article, saying in effect that: What the colonial powers could do in medieval
time we, the Jews of modern time can do with impunity.
Actually, he is revealing more than that without
knowing it. The reality is that in all the places which the old colonial powers
retain to this day, the indigenous people became citizens of the occupying
power. Fair or unfair, all of this happened hundreds of years ago, and the
result is that when the descendants of the indigenous people are now asked to
vote on retaining that citizenship or breaking away, they say they wish to
maintain the status quo. This happened not long ago in Gibraltar and the
Falkland Islands.
That is not happening in occupied Palestine where the
Palestinians are slowly being ethnic cleansed out of their land to make room
for every little fart that calls himself or herself a Jew. This behavior is
worse by several degrees than the measures enforced by the colonial powers in
medieval time. That is, not only are the Jews denying equality to the
indigenous Palestinians, they are not even tolerating them staying in their
homes. Worse, they are cleansing them out of the land that has been theirs
since the beginning of time.
When you consider the enormity of this horror as
compared to the system that was adopted in Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa,
where the locals were considered second class citizens but not ethnic cleansed
out of their land, you conclude that the Jews are begging for a horrific
outcome. It will be worse than happened in Rhodesia or South Africa; worse than
the simple destruction of the Zionist regime in so-called Israel.
But why is it that someone with the education level of
Stephen Flatow cannot see this? Well, there are many clues in the article that
answer this question, one being buried in this passage: “The issue is not just
that these countries are incredibly hypocritical for haranguing Israel about
annexation while themselves annexing any territory they can get their hands
on”.
As can be seen, Flatow speaks in the present tense
about a behavior of the old colonial powers, that goes back several centuries.
This makes it sound that concurrent with Israel, the colonial powers are
annexing new territory today. This is false, of course, but alleging it
establishes a non-existent parity between the full citizenship enjoyed by the
former colonies, and the fate that the Jews envision for the Palestinians they
are cleansing out of their homeland.
Time, chronology and causality are cognitive traits
proper to the human species at the exclusion of all the other species. It is
what the Jewish child is robbed of by the method of indoctrination it receives
at every stage while growing up.
It is why Stephen Flatow believes that the Stone Age
of biblical time is the same as the Medieval Age, and the same as contemporary
time. He has no sense of the passage of time.
It is why fanatic Jews believe that a “mere” 2,000
years of them being in exile, is shorter than a “whopping” 70 years for the
Palestinians to be refugees.
It is why they claim that they are closer in time to
what they claim is their ancestral homeland, than the Palestinian refugees that
have been away for such a long, long time.